My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:44:00 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
2/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3.0 Environmental Impact Checklist <br /> 3.16 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC <br /> Ia) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, <br /> or policy establishing measures of effectiveness <br /> for the performance of the circulation system, <br /> taking into account all modes of transportation ❑ ® ❑ <br /> including mass transit and non-motorized travel <br /> and relevant components of the circulation <br /> system, including, but not limited to, <br /> intersections, streets, highways and freeways, <br /> pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congestion <br /> management program,including,but not I <br /> limited to, level of service standards and travel ❑ I ❑ I „ ❑ <br /> demand measures, or other standards <br /> established by the county congestion <br /> management agency for designated roads or <br /> highways? i <br /> c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns. <br /> including either an increase in traffic levels or a ❑ <br /> change in location that results in substantial <br /> safety risks? <br /> d) Substantially increase hazards due to a <br /> design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous ❑ I ❑ ❑ <br /> intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm <br /> equipment)? — —� -- - -- <br /> e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 i, ® ❑ ❑ <br /> 1) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or <br /> programs regarding public transit,bicycle, or ❑ ❑ // <br /> pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the <br /> performance or safety of such facilities? !! <br /> a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of <br /> effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system,taking into account all modes of <br /> transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of <br /> the circulation system, including,but not limited to, intersections,streets,highways and <br /> freeways,pedestrian and bicycle paths,and mass transit? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,including,but not limited <br /> to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by <br /> the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> Less-than-Significant Impact. The City has an established policy with respect to project-related <br /> traffic increases to residential streets such as Kentfield Avenue.An increase of more than 5 <br /> percent of traffic generated by the project would be considered an impact;this threshold is <br /> La Palma Subdivision Project <br /> Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.