My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC15-02 PC Reso (3052) to Adopt Vesting Tentative Map & Planned Dev Permit - La Palma
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Reso PC15-02 PC Reso (3052) to Adopt Vesting Tentative Map & Planned Dev Permit - La Palma
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:42:00 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
2/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The proposed project will not conflict with any written public policy or with <br /> the public interest as determined by the Planning Commission . <br /> Section 3. Subdivision Ordinance Exception (Subdivision Ordinance <br /> Section 30 . 69) : The Planning Commission finds that: <br /> a . The property is of such shape or size, or is affected by such topographical <br /> conditions , or is subject to such title limitations of record that it is <br /> impossible or impracticable for the subdivider to comply with the <br /> requirement with which exception is taken . <br /> The project's 12 units/acre density is consistent with the density standards <br /> of the City's General Plan and R-2 zoning district, which allows up to 16 <br /> units/acre; however, due to the site's irregular shape and size it would be <br /> impractical for the subdivider to comply with the requirements with which <br /> exception are taken . The proposed 25-foot wide roadway is considered a <br /> superior roadway design option for this particular development because it <br /> is proportionally sized/scaled to the site's relatively small size and <br /> vehicular demand . <br /> The site is a relatively small-sized ( 1 acre) in-fill property that does not <br /> warrant a full , 34-foot roadway width and 60-foot right-of-way width . The <br /> proposed 25-foot wide privately-owned and maintained local street is not <br /> necessary for neighborhood or general citywide circulation needs; rather it <br /> is a privately owned and maintained local street intended to serve only 10 <br /> property owners and their guests (2 of the project's 12 lots are accessed <br /> directly from Kentfield Avenue). By comparison the City has approved <br /> many similarly-scaled , multi-phased residential Projects in the City, and <br /> more specifically in the neighborhood and immediately adjacent to the <br /> subject proposed project site (Kentfield Pacific, LLC ; Kentfield Manor <br /> Townhomes), with private 25-foot wide, two-way private roadways (per <br /> City Engineering standard ). The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the <br /> traffic counts for Kentfield Avenue and a Traffic impact Analysis prepared <br /> by City staff March 2009 , and concurs that that the proposed 25-foot wide <br /> roadway would meet necessary access and circulation needs of the <br /> Project. <br /> b . The exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the subdivider. <br /> As previously stated , two nearby Planned Development projects (Kentfield <br /> Pacific, LLC; Kentfield Manor Townhomes) were approved and <br /> constructed immediately with 25-foot wide road widths. Furthermore , the <br /> La Palma project is located near nine other PD projects that were <br /> approved and built from 1964 and up to 2013, with road widths that range <br /> in size from 20 feet up to 32 feet (32-foot wide project consisted of 45 <br /> ATTY/RES0.3052/PC RESO TO ADOPT VESTING TENTATIVE MAP & PLANNED DEV PERMIT — LA PALMA <br /> REV: 02-03-15 VR <br /> Page 4 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.