My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC15-02 PC Reso (3052) to Adopt Vesting Tentative Map & Planned Dev Permit - La Palma
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Reso PC15-02 PC Reso (3052) to Adopt Vesting Tentative Map & Planned Dev Permit - La Palma
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:42:00 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
2/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
residential units on a 6 .32 acre site, and the 20-foot wide road width <br /> project was for a project consisting of 17 units on a 1 acre site). <br /> c. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare <br /> or injurious to other property in the vicinity of the subject property. <br /> Allowing a modification to the City's Street Design for a Local Street would <br /> not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the <br /> vicinity of the subject property as the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative <br /> Declaration ( IS/MND ) determined that the Project, with mitigation <br /> measures, would not create significant environmental impacts . The Plan <br /> Review Committee has also determined that the roadway meets <br /> emergency vehicle (public safety) and general circulation access needs. <br /> The roadway modification would also not be injurious to other properties in <br /> the vicinity because its design is proportionally sized to the 10 units that it <br /> serves rather than being oversized/excessive for its intended purpose. <br /> With the street design modification , the subdivider would be able to design <br /> a better subdivision (a park that would be open to the residents of La <br /> Palma and the neighborhood , more pervious surfaces, more on-site trees <br /> saved , simplified/safer roadway configuration that would include more <br /> guest parking than is required pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance, marked <br /> pavement for pedestrians and traffic calming) and other improvements <br /> that would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to <br /> properties in the vicinity. <br /> Section 4 . Planned Development Modifications (Zoning Ordinance <br /> Section 46. 7 (A)): The Planning Commission finds that: <br /> (a ) Consistent with Zoning Ordinance Article 46 (Planned Development) <br /> the City may permit any of the following requirements to be different from those <br /> which would otherwise apply in the applicable zoning district if it is determined <br /> that the proposed development will provide an environment of physical and <br /> functional desirability, in harmony with the character of the surrounding <br /> neighborhood or district: <br /> 1 . Maximum heights for structures; <br /> 2 . Maximum lot coverage; <br /> 3. Minimum building site sizes (a density increase is not permitted ); <br /> 4. Minimum front, side, and rear yard setback requirements; <br /> 5 . Minimum number of parking spaces required and parking space design <br /> (b) Requested Development Standard Modifications (Article 6) zoning <br /> standards are sought: <br /> ATTY/RES0.3052/PC RESO TO ADOPT VESTING TENTATIVE MAP & PLANNED DEV PERMIT — LA PALMA <br /> REV: 02-03-15 VR <br /> Page 5 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.