My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1975
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
CC MIN 1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2016 12:56:31 PM
Creation date
3/18/2015 7:53:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/2/1975
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
383. <br /> City Manager - Account No . 570 (continued) <br /> Mr. Chichester, 1535 Maddux, stated that he did not re- <br /> ceive the newsletter in the mail. <br /> MOTION : Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Rhodes, to delete from the budget the amount of $15,600 <br /> for the City' s quarterly newsletter, and that a single <br /> page news sheet be included with the Parks and Recreation <br /> Schedule. <br /> A lengthy discussion followed during which. Council noted <br /> that initially the newsletter was authorized in order to <br /> inform the public , and comments related to whether it <br /> is reaching Redwood City residents, and that portions of <br /> the costs if this item is eliminated relate to the mail- <br /> ing of the Recreation schedules and therefore would need <br /> to be transferred over to that account. <br /> The motion failed on the following roll call vote : <br /> Ayes : Councilmen Norris and Rhodes <br /> Noes : Councilmen Barrett, Henderson, Leipzig, <br /> Williams and Mayor Weymouth <br /> Mayor Weymouth responded to complaints from members of <br /> the audience relating to higher property taxes, which he <br /> explained resulted from recent reassessment of property <br /> values by the County Assessor ' s office . He referred to <br /> the Budget Summary section on Page 5 of the proposed <br /> budget depicting a graph of the proportionate shares of <br /> tax revenues going to the City, County Special Districts <br /> and School Districts , noting that the City accounts for <br /> about 20% of the total. He pointed out that the City has <br /> no control over the assessed values, but only over what <br /> is in the budget before them. <br /> John Bacca, 334 Hudson, indicated he believed the Council- <br /> men had received a salary increase. It was explained to <br /> him that an increase from $150 to $250 per month for the <br /> Council had been presented to the voters in the form of <br /> a Charter amendment at the last municipal election, but <br /> was defeated. <br /> Fran:. Esposito, 243)4 Oregon Avenue, referred to a recent <br /> Redwood City Tribune article concerning the City tax rate <br /> in which he was given the impression that the average in- <br /> crease in assessed valuation amounted to 35% and cited <br /> what he believed this would translate into in budget <br /> revenues. City Manager Fales responded that the actual <br /> over all net increase was estimated to be approximately <br /> 16% because many properties, principally commercial and <br /> industrial, were not reassessed this year. <br /> roma <br /> "Barney" Barnes commented that he recognized that dollar <br /> *k'"" cuts would not necessarily reduce the tax rate to any <br /> extent. <br /> -3- <br /> Budge t <br /> Study <br /> 5/17/75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.