My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1975
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
CC MIN 1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2016 12:56:31 PM
Creation date
3/18/2015 7:53:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/2/1975
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
401 <br /> accomplished adjacent to their own homes, and added that <br /> such is the practice in most other cities in the State. <br /> If the City eliminated the Sidewalk Program, a saving <br /> of $26,500 and about 4,000 man hours per year could be <br /> realized, and property owners would be responsible on <br /> an individual basis for sidewalk repairs as they are in <br /> other cities . <br /> Discussion followed and Mr. Fales and Director of Public <br /> Works Pusich commented regarding practices in other <br /> cities with regard to sidewalk repair; the existence of <br /> unusual problems in Redwood City as a result of planting <br /> of undesirable street trees by early developers; the <br /> possibility of making sidewalk repairs required because <br /> of street tree damage the responsibility of property <br /> owners only after weed street trees have been replaced <br /> with desirable and appropriate trees; the probable cost <br /> of sidewalk repairs; the fact that property owners can <br /> be required to repair their sidewalks; the fact that the <br /> burden of sidewalk repairs is most likely to fall on <br /> older citizens who live in the areas where older trees <br /> cause damage; the cost of about two cents on the tax <br /> rate for the Sidewalk Program rather than requiring <br /> individuals to accept risk; and the procedures which <br /> would be followed in the event the Council wishes to <br /> eliminate the Sidewalk Program in favor of the usual <br /> procedure in other cities . <br /> Mary Glass, stated that at one time she was required to <br /> pay J254 for such repairs and believes the responsibility <br /> for sidewalk repair required because of street tree dam- <br /> age be that of the individual property owner. <br /> Citizen, Wellesley Crescent, inquired concerning the <br /> City' s possible liability with regard to injuries caused <br /> by falls on damaged sidewalk. Mr. Fales explained that <br /> liability may occur if the City has been advised of <br /> damaged sidewalk and taken no action to see that it is <br /> repaired and that such claims are usually filed against <br /> the property owner and the City. <br /> Gordon Williams (see above) , suggested people can more <br /> easily afford the small amount on the tax rate than the <br /> cost of sidewalk repair on an individual basis . <br /> In response to question, Park and Recreation Director <br /> Weeks commented on the street tree study currently under <br /> way. <br /> Mr. Katshen (see above) , suggested that many people would <br /> volunteer to cut down a problem tree to obtain firewood. <br /> Staff explained that the trunk and roots must be removed <br /> also. <br /> Lengthy discussion continued concerning street trees . <br /> tow <br /> Lou Byrne, 180 Oakdale, advised that one of his reasons <br /> for moving to Redwood City was because there were many <br /> street trees. <br /> -8- <br /> Budget <br /> Study <br /> 5/31/75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.