Laserfiche WebLink
both by the Planning Commission and the City Council , and <br /> that the proposed Plan was now before Council for public <br /> hearing. He advised that the Planning Director and his staff <br /> were present to respond to questions that might be raised <br /> Reference was made to a communication from the City of San <br /> Mateo addressed to Mr Schroeter, with copies to Council , in <br /> which it was requested that the proposed General Plan be amended <br /> to "indicate a Laurie Meadows Drive connection to Shoreway Road <br /> similar to that shown in the Nolte Report adopted by San Mateo <br /> in 1975," and to "indicate a channel connection between Marina <br /> Lagoon and Belmont Slough. " <br /> Planning Director Schroeter responded, identifying the location <br /> on a drawing displayed on the wall , and indicating that the <br /> comments in the letter referring to Marina Lagoon-Belmont <br /> Slough connection related to a strip that is part of the City <br /> of Redwood City. This was shown on the Plan as a waterway and <br /> it was assumed that to continue as a waterway will satisfy San <br /> Mateo's concern. With regard to the Shoreway Road connection, <br /> this modification had been made by Council , and while it did <br /> not appear in the Planning Commission's draft, it was his under- <br /> standing that it was to be incorporated in the General Plan. <br /> Maggie Gunn, 16 Selby Lane, referred to Page D-16 in the section <br /> of the proposed Comprehensive General Plan relating to the Open <br /> Space Element, subsection 5, Proposals, and stated that the <br /> word "require" should be substituted for the word "encourage" <br /> with respect to the setting aside of land for parks by developers <br /> She also offered comparisons with other cities with respect to <br /> the ratio of tax rates in relation to percentage of land in parks <br /> and open space <br /> It was pointed out to Ms Gunn that the position of the Park <br /> and Recreation Commission as noted in a communication from the <br /> Director of Parks and Recreation is " . .urge the Planning Com- <br /> mission to include the adoption of legislation requiring sub- <br /> dividers to dedicate land for open space uses or pay a fee in <br /> lieu thereof as a part of the Open Space Element of the General <br /> Plan " <br /> Mr. Fales noted that because Redwood City, with exception of the <br /> Redwood Shores area, is completely developed, it is difficult to <br /> require the setting aside of open space and questioned whether <br /> it would be practical to change the wording in the General Plan <br /> since among other things, there may be inequities involved, and <br /> in any event, neither word as used in the General Plan would <br /> have a limiting effect on the City and any binding legislation <br /> to impose requirements would be done by ordinance. <br /> In the continuing discussion, Council noted the very limited <br /> open space available within the City limits, and in fact, even <br /> in the event of large annexations of unincorporated area, the <br /> areas in the City's sphere of influence are largely developed. <br /> Robert Saint, 872 Chesterton Avenue, read in full a statement <br /> of "People for Intelligent City Planning before the Redwood <br /> City Council ," identifying himself as vice chairman of that <br /> -3- <br /> Reg Mtg <br /> 12/15/75 <br />