Reso HRAC15-05 (3090) 815 Hamilton

Browse Search

theater, but it is doubtful that it could be considered a building addition. Instead, it serves an exterior landscaping/service purpose that is of direct benefit to the continued theater use. Guidelines: a . Alterations to non-historic storefront elements within historic façades should be done in a manner that is stylistically compatible with the historic façade , and new signage on historic façades should be compatible with the architecture of the historic façade in terms of colors, materials, size, placement, and style. Finding: This guideline is not applicable to the proposed Dressing-room Wing Rehabilitation project. 3. Section 2 . 1 .4(A) — Mitigation of Impacts of Development on Properties that Contain Historic Resources to be Preserved : Any project which proposes additions or modifications to a property designated as a "Historic Resource to be Preserved" on the Historic Resources Preservation Regulations Map shall comply with the following regulations if City staff makes a preliminary determination that the project may have a potentially significant adverse effect on the historic resource (the Fox Theatre): Standards: a . The applicant shall , to City satisfaction , ensure that the project adheres to one or both of the following standards: 0 Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving , Rehabilitating , Restoring , and Reconstructing Historic Buildings; or e Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings ( 1995), Weeks and Grimmer. The project shall be reviewed by a qualified architect or architectural historian approved by the City and meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards published in the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR part 61 ) , who shall make a recommendation to the City's Historic Resources Advisory Committee as to whether the project fully adheres to the Secretary Standards for Rehabilitation , as well as to whether any specific modifications are necessary to do so . The final determination as to a project's adherence to the Standards for Rehabilitation shall be made by the Historic Resources Advisory Commission or the body with final decision-making authority over the project. Finding: Staff has determined that Section 2. 1 . 4(A) of the DTPP does not apply to the project based on the historian report's finding that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on a historic resource because the project meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the DTPP standards and regulations for rehabilitation and adjacent new construction. The historian report has determined that the dressing-room wing does not meet any eligibility requirements for listing on ATTY/RES0.3090/H RAC RESO — 815 HAMILTON REV: 06-02-15 VR Page 6 of 12