Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and NPDES related Functions." Director Ingram explained the fee for service concept <br />and why this proposed fee qualifies for that characterization. Director Ingram <br />expanded on the Attachments included in the staff report and the Engineer's Report, <br />and presented the Council Utilities Committee and staff considerations and <br />recommendations: The cost of maintaining an effective federally mandated program <br />was $875,000. The original letter recommended that the whole program be funded <br />through a users fee collected by the County on the property tax bill. In response to <br />community input, the present recommendation was for $447,000 to be funded through <br />the user fee collected by the County and the balance to be subsidized from other <br />funds. Director Ingram explained that this type of program, like the sewer and water <br />enterprise funds, cannot be sustained through general fund monies, and needs to have <br />independent funding and optimum accountability. Director Ingram advised that after <br />reviewing the County's program and 12 of the 20 cities in the County that had <br />adopted their own NPDES funding program, it was the opinion of staff that a separate <br />fund to oversee and pay for the federally mandated NPDES program was the best way <br />to provide accountability and remain in compliance; and allowing the County to <br />collect the user fee would be the most cost effective way to fund the program as it <br />eliminated the need to create a new bureaucracy to collect the fee for service revenue <br />that could sustain the program. <br />FUND CURRENTLY 6/8/95 LETTER RECOMMENDED <br />General Fund 447,000 No Subsidy' 447,000 <br />Sewer Enterprise 272,000 No Subsidy No Subsidy <br />Capital Improvement 156,000 No Subsidy No Subsidy <br />Director Ingram advised that this amounted to $0.91 per month per single family <br />residence, and recommended that the Council approve the Resolution setting local <br />program service fees to be levied against real property parcels throughout the City for <br />Fiscal Year 1995/96 to be transferred into a new special revenue fund to be known as <br />the Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Program Fund, pursuant to City <br />of Redwood City Ordinance 2090. <br />In answer to Council questions, Director Ingram advised there is now a great deal of <br />data to establish baseline measurements for quality control of bay water, and over the <br />long term it will be available for quantifiable and qualitative interpretations. Director <br />Ingram described the collaborative participation between the County and the City and <br />the non-duplication of each program's efforts. Director Ingram described those <br />institutions and properties exempt from this fee, and City Attorney Schricker <br />advised that banks are not exempt, even though they do not pay property tax. <br />City Manager Everett advised that the City of San Mateo includes street sweeping <br />as part of its NPDES program, and that a fee for service is collected on garbage bills <br />by BFI. City Manager Everett added that Redwood City will not include street <br />sweeping in its NPDES program and its cost will continue to be funded through the <br /> Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 <br /> July 24, 1995 Page No. 281 <br /> Page 9 <br />