My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1995-10-16 Stdy
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC Min 1995-10-16 Stdy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:47:53 PM
Creation date
7/2/2004 4:09:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
10/16/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> Council asked the Planning Commission to add review of the Redwood City Sign <br /> Ordinance to their work plan, to attend meetings of other boards, committees, <br /> commissions, agencies and community groups to gather and share information and <br /> resources. <br /> MEMO 10/17/95 <br /> In response to Commissioner McCoy's statement regarding Council's positions on <br /> upcoming issues, Mayor Gasparini stated she believed it was important for the <br /> Commissioners to bring their professional experience, knowledge, and independent <br /> opinions to the issues without Council influence. <br /> MEMO 10/17/95 <br /> Council complimented the Commissioners on their focus groups and encouraged them <br /> to go out into the community to hear what the community wants. <br /> 3) Architectural Advisory Committee; <br /> REPORT: 1996 Architectural Advisory Committee Annual Work Program <br /> Committee Members present: Tom Gilman and Dr. Steven Howard. <br /> Chairman Gilman described the work of the Committee and its review of <br /> applications. Chairman Gilman expressed frustration in the long review process and <br /> advised it was related to the advisory nature of the Committee's charge from the <br /> Council. He advised that the Committee believed it would be more effective if its <br /> reviews were mandatory instead of advisory, and based on specific minimum <br /> standards. <br /> In response to Council questions, Chairman Gilman advised the Committee was <br /> reviewing the City's urban design guidelines and would recommend updating and <br /> modifications. Another goal of the Committee was to work with more City boards, <br /> committees and commissions, including the Historic Resources Advisory Committee <br /> and the Civic Cultural Committee. Chairman Gilman acknowledged the importance of <br /> timeliness and being involved in the process very early on. <br /> Dr. Howard discussed the costs of application processes and the Committee's <br /> commitment to shorten the process. <br /> In response to Council questions, City Attorney Schricker advised the status of the <br /> Committee could be changed through adoption of an ordinance. <br /> MEMO 10/17/95 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 <br /> Page No. 382 Study Session Minutes <br /> October 16, 1995 <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.