Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> In response to Councilman Ruskin's questions, Planning Director Patterson <br /> advised that every single employee had input into the design, especially the continuous <br /> front counter which will maximize contact with the public by the departments most <br /> visited by the public. <br /> Vice Mayor Howard echoed Councilman Ruskin's request that when the options are <br /> presented to Council they be accompanied by drawings or other visual aids. Vice <br /> Mayor Howard stated it was important to maintain the integrity of the building that the <br /> people of Redwood City selected during the design competition, and she shared <br /> Councilman Ruskin's concerns regarding the look of the building facing Main and <br /> Broadway as well as Jefferson and Middlefield. <br /> MEMO 12/5/95 <br /> C. Public Comment relating to design issues <br /> Mayor Hartnett recognized those who wished to speak to this issue. <br /> 1. Nick Watry, architect and Redwood City Planning Commissioner, spoke in favor of <br /> the project advising that as a Commissioner he had reviewed the plans. Mr. Watry <br /> stated that cities are judged by their architecture, opera, symphonies, and fine arts. <br /> Redwood City doesn't have a lot of those activities but it was on the verge of <br /> greatness, and the proposed design would enhance that process. Mr. Watry asked that <br /> the current design be used even it costs a little more, and urged the Council to retain <br /> the highest quality possible. <br /> 2. Tamara Piulle, Redwood City Civic Cultural Commissioner, spoke in favor of the <br /> project stating the original design complemented the Main Library. Mrs. Piulle asked <br /> that the architecture not be changed, including the expansion area and Council height <br /> limit, but agreed that some of the brick could be eliminated without destroying the <br /> integrity of the building. Mrs. Piulle urged the Council to go forward as quickly as <br /> possible. <br /> 3. Pete Hughes, 18 Admiralty court, Redwood City, stated he would like to see the cost <br /> reduced if possible, that $238 per square foot was too expensive. He stated that his <br /> house could be reconstructed at $105 per square. Mr. Hughes stated "Redwood City is <br /> a working class City" and $150-$175 per square foot would be enough to build an <br /> attractive and utilitarian building. Mr. Hughes stated he was embarrassed by the <br /> opulent Redwood City Police Facilities. He said City Hall cost savings could be <br /> achieved by eliminating the Council Chambers, any marble or wood paneling, <br /> expensive furnishings and postponing some of the project to another time. <br /> 4. Joe Steinfeld, 850 Main Street, Redwood City, stated the City could not afford the <br /> proposed City Hall and it wasn't needed. He stated the public did not have all options <br /> available to them to choose from including buying or leasing existing buildings or <br /> turning the police facility into a City Hall. Mr. Steinfeld advised that the bidding <br /> system should have always included prequalification, and asked the Council to stop the <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 Special City Council Study Session Minutes <br /> December 4, 1995 <br /> Page No. 458 Page 5 <br />