Laserfiche WebLink
142 <br />V. Spillers noted absent. Also present were City Manager E. A. Rolison, City Attorney C. B. Currie, City <br />Engineer Glenn M. Jain, eater Superintendent H. L. '°Tinter, Building Inspector S. H. Kreiss, Acting Police <br />Chief Theodore Moudakas, Fire Chief J. L. Lodi, Assistant to City Manager L. A. Kinball, Park and Recreation <br />Commissioner Gerry Verssen and Account—Clerk Vivian Holmquist. <br />Councilman rritschgi moved that the r:u nute;s of April 16th, 23rd and the 30th be approved as mailed, seconded by <br />Councilman Stout. Councilman '.eiss stated that he had some corrections he would like to make. The following <br />are his corrections. ma <br />April 16th minutes, page 1, last paragraph reads as f ollays: Councilman Weiss stated that though the vote <br />was 5 to 2 he was of the opinion that the vote should be unanimous, etc. Councilman Neiss asked that it <br />be changed to: he was of the opinion that the vote should, in the interest of harmoney, he unanimous, etc. <br />April 16th minutes, page 3, second paragraph under public hearing, rezone property Oak Knoll and Canyon <br />..rit <br />Road From 11U" to C -1—H. City Attorney Currie stated that any proper that comes into the City immediately <br />goes into an U District and then if the Planning Commission desires they may recommend the rezoning of <br />the property in the usual manner. Councilman '�Ieiss asked that this be changed to: City Attorney Currie <br />stated that any property that comes into the City immediately goes into an U District and no promises can <br />validly be made and then if the Planning Commission desires they may later recommend the rezoning, etc. <br />City Engineer Jain stated that the motion was not correct in rezoning all of the lots, it should just be a <br />portion of the lots. The Clerk stated that the letter from the Planning Commission indicated all,of the <br />lots not a portion were recommended. It was decided to leave the minutes rc=ad all the lots and the City <br />Attorney was asked to check into the matter before drawing up the ordinance. <br />April 23rd minutes, third paragraph. Councilman !Ieiss was of the opinion that this should be held over <br />for 30 days, etc. He asked that this be changed to: Councilman "Teiss was of the opinion that this should <br />be held over for 30 to 60 days, etc. <br />April 30th minutes, second paragraph, page 2. Canyon Road should be corrected to Canada Road. <br />April 30th minutes, first -paragraph, page 3. Councilman 7reiss adked that the f ollowing be added after <br />the sentence regarding :75.00 annexation fee; Are the people aware that they are subject to the $75.00 <br />annexation fee per lot? <br />The Clerk was asked to make the chnages as noted. The motion carried. There was general discussion <br />in regard to how corrections should be noted and brought to the attention of the Council. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, O?EN BIDS, SALE OF POPLAR—HESS—EBETIER BONDS. The following bids were received: <br />Blair & Co., Incorporated <br />L. H. Easterling & Co. <br />The sum of 98801% of par plus accrued interest to date of delivery for bonds bearing a coupon <br />rate of 52%. <br />Stone & Youngberg <br />The sum of 97.55% of the principal amount thereof, plus accured interest to date of delivery, <br />for such bonds to bear interest at the rate of 521% per annum. <br />City Attorney Currie was adked to check the bids and report back later in the meeting. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO MAKE CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS, PARKING DISTRICT 1, LOT IV. <br />Affidavit of publication was ordered filed. This was followed b�,T a short discussion after which Council— <br />man Herkner offered RESOLUTION 2030 BEING RESOLUTION OF ININTION TO 1444E CHANGES WD I!ODTFICATT_ONS., � <br />PARKING DISTRICT 11 LOT IV and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried on roll <br />call with Councilman Spillers being noted absent. <br />PliBLTC HEARING, PROPOSED OFFICIAL PLAN LINES, BEECH ST -BEET FROM HILTON TO STA:IiAUGH. There were no written <br />protests. Pair. James O'Connor, representing his father who lives at 427 Stambaugh Street, stated that <br />this would take a strip 151 x 2001 from their property and since Beech Street would only go as far as <br />the railroad tracks he couldn't see any reason why they :ranted to extend the street. He suggested Cedar <br />