Laserfiche WebLink
r-- <br />11 <br />Cr <br />1.63 <br />$159000 and $20,000. It is questionable whether such an expenditure for parking would be warranted. <br />Although no other suitable location could be found, the committee does not wish to imply that <br />the storyland idea is not worthy of consideration if a desirablb site were located at some future <br />date. <br />It was agreed that if possible the recommendation would be presented to City Council on Monday <br />May 21p <br />Respectfully, <br />Vincent Rambo, Chairman <br />Mr. Rambo ~stated that the only other possible site in Redwood City was the Yacht Harbor and the Committee <br />did not feel that this would do for their project. <br />Councilman Herkner moved that this Committee be given a vote of thanks for such a complete report on such an <br />intangible thing, and also to acdept the report, seconded by Councilman Weiss. Councilman Stout was of the <br />opinion that a letter should be written by the Clerk to each member of the Committee. This was included in <br />the motion which carried. <br />Mr. Rambo stated that there wasn't much more that the Committee could do on this until the City takes same <br />action. The mayor asked the Clerk to send a copy of this report to the Park and Recreation Commission <br />requesting their recommendation on this report. Councilman Britschgi was of the opinion that if Stulsaft <br />Park were considered they couldn't possibly park all the cars and still have roam for the park. Councilman <br />Granger stated that the people who made the recommendation to have the Fairyland should be given a vote of <br />thanks also, and he was of the opinion that the Clerk should write a letter to the Lions Club telling them <br />that the Council is still looking favorably on this project and will try to find a suitable place either in <br />Redwood City or even possibly someplace in the County. Councilman Granger made this in the form of a motion <br />which was seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />REPORT ON BID OPENING, 125 CFM COMPRESSCR FOR THE WATER DEPARTMENT. The following bids were received: <br />Schramm, Inc. <br />1315 Howard Street <br />San Francisco <br />Vern & Flynn's rental Service <br />1527 Old County Road <br />San Carlos <br />Edward R. Bacon Co. <br />Folsom & 17th Streets <br />San Francisco <br />Western Traction Co. <br />2230 Third Street <br />San Francisco <br />West Coast Engine and <br />Equipment Compar*r <br />1077 Eastshore Highway <br />Berkeley <br />1 only new "Schramm <br />125 CFM piston driven <br />Air Compressor <br />(specs. called for rotary type) $ 3,191.97 <br />1 only Worthington <br />125 CFM Air Compressor <br />$ 3,741.48 <br />1 only new Jaeger Model <br />125 Rotary "Air Plus" $ 3,901.64 <br />Portable Compressor <br />1 only new Chicago Pneumatic <br />125 CFM Rotary Portable <br />Air Compressor $ 3,957.73 <br />1 only 125 CFM Worthington <br />Rotary Compressor to meet <br />City specification <br />$ 4,325.00 <br />The Water Superintendent recommended acceptance of the Edward R. Bacon Company bid for supplying a new 125 <br />CFM Jaeger Rotary "Air Plus" Po.,table Compressor in the amount of $39901.64. This compressor meets the City <br />specifications and is powered by a heavy duty six cylinder engine which he believes tends toward a lower <br />speed and more quiet operation. The other compressors have four cylinder engines. <br />The Water Department has three Jaeger Compressors now in service and the Street Department recently purchased <br />a similar unit. The maintenance service of the Edward R. Bacon Company has always been very satiffactory. <br />The City Manager concurred in the Water Superintendents recommendation since he believes that this represents <br />the best value to the City. <br />C*Uhcilman Spillers moved to accept the recommendation and award the bid to Edward R. Bacon Co. This was <br />followed by a lengthy discussion as to why this bid was recommended rather than the lowest bid. The lowest <br />bid was a piston and not rotary compressor as called for in the bids. The Bacon Company compressor is a <br />6 cylinder compressor whereas the others bid on a 4 cylinder one. Under the specifications they could bid <br />on either the 4 or the 6 cylinder. Councilman Stout seconded Councilman Spillers motion. This was followed <br />