CC MIN 1956 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

194 offered RESOLUTION 2047 BEING THE RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION, MANZANITA-LAUREL-HILTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. This was followed by discussion. Councilman Granger wanted to know why Manazanita wasn't tied in with Stambaugh. Mr. Jain stated that they could not contact the people to sign the petition. He further stated that all the street on Manazanita will be included which has not been paved before. The motion carried on roll call with Councilman Spillers being noted absent. �I RESOLUTION AMENDING PERSONNEL RULES. The question was raised as to whether or not this resolutionvvas satisfactory to the employees. George Asvos, President of the Employees Association, asked that this be held up so the employees could check into the amendments. Councilman Britschgi moved that this be carried on the agenda for two weeks, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING ELECTRICAL CODE. City Attorney Currie stated that this was mow approved by the Building Inspector. Councilman Britschgi raised the question as to the number of code ordinances which are being amended. Building Inspector Kreiss stated they they were only trying to bring their records up to date and also be in agreement with,the majority of the Cities in the County. The City is operating under the 1941 Electrical Code. This was followed by discussion. Councilman Granger stated that he wanted to bring out to the people that they voted down -the Charter amendment regarding -printing of such ordinances and it is now going to.the the City $1,300 for advertising of the codes. This was followed by more discussion after which Councilman Britschgi moved that the Building Inspector list the major changes up -dating the ordinance since 1911, seconded by Councilman Stout. Councilman Granger offered a substitute motion which the City Attorney ruled was not legal. This was followed by further discussion. Building Inspector Kreiss stated that he was trying to get the Electrical Code up to the requirements of the County and the City of San Mateo. The Mayor said the motion now before the Council was to continue this for two weeks and the Building Inspector to list ON" the major changes. This motion carried with Councilman Granger voting No. %am Councilman Stout was of the opinion that the Building Inspector was going to request changes in the Building and also the Plumbing Code. He thought these changes should also be brought to the attention of,the Council. Building Inspector Kreiss stated that they are trying to take advantage of the present budget and get a part of the -code adopted this year while there was still money left in the budget. PROGRESS ESTIMATE NO. 1, ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, 12" WATER MAIN, IN THE A.P.40UNT OF 46,813.00. Councilman I Britschgi moved that this bill be paid, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. PROGRESS ESTIMATE N0. 1, OSCAR C. HOT11ES, INC., PARKING DISTRICT, LOT IV, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,915.00. Councilman Herkner moved that the bill be paid, seconded by Councilman Stout and earried. PROGRESS ESTIMATE NO. 6, 0. C. JONES & DONS, PARKING DISTRICT, LOT VII, IN THE AMOUNT OF $628,779.02. Councilman Stout moved that the bill be paid, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. PLANNING CO181ISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL APPLICATION OF S..A, COTTRELL FOR VARIANCE TO '1LLaV A 101 REAR YARD WHERE THERE IS AN ALLEY TO THE REAR. Councilman, Granger offered RESOLUTION 20118 FOR VARIANCE r.r FOR THE ABOVE and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Herkner. The Clerk read the letter from the Planning Commission wherein it was stated that there were no protests at the public hearing and the Planning Commission found that this variance, if granted, would not be detrimental to the, surrounding area or to public health and safety because of the alley to the rear. Mr. Cottrell asked if the Council could change the variance to a 51 rear yard. The Mayor informed Mr. Cottrell ago that that would mean referring this matter back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Cottrell asked the Council to proceed with the 101 rear yeard variance. This was followed by discussion after which the motion carried on roll call with Councilman Spillers being noted absent. PLANNING CU,MSSI ON RECOMMENDED REZONING LOT 71 BLOCK 7, WOODSIDE ACRES NO. 1 (DALE STEWART, 1630 Union