Laserfiche WebLink
197 <br />Minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting <br />Redwood City Council <br />June 25, 1956 8:00 P. M. <br />Invocation was lead by Reverend Lester Westling of St. Peters Episcopal Church. <br />ON ROLL CALL the following were noted present: Councilmen Carl A. Britschgi, Floyd D. Granger, Sidney D. <br />F"N Herkner, Robert V. Spillers, Hiram S. Stout, Louis Weiss, Mayor William H. Royer and City Clerk R. S. Dodge, <br />Also present were City Manager E. -A. Rolison, City Attorney C. B. Currie, City Engineer Glenn M. Jain, Fire <br />Chief J. L, Lodi, Tax Collector Paul E. Perrin, Street Maintenance Superintendent Doyle Chester, Planning <br />Commissioner,Leonard Greenwold, Assessor—Auditor John J. Brophy, Water Superintendent H. L. Winter, <br />Building Inspector S. H. Kreiss, Police Chief William Faulstich, Police Captain Theodore Moudakas, Assistant <br />to City Manager L. A. Kimball, Fire Marshal George Asvos and Account Clerk Vivian Holmquist• <br />INDUSTRIAL WAY BIDS, RELEASE CERTIFIED CHECKS TO UNSECCESSFUL BIDDERS. The City Attorney stated that both <br />acquisition and contract cost have increased to $35,000.00 The Council can either reassess everyone or they <br />can contribute money to the project. Councilman Granger offered RESOLUTION 2049 AWARDING THE BID FOR <br />INDUSTRIAL WAY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LOST BIDDER, OSCAR C. HOLMES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $98,213.50 and <br />moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Councilman Granger stated that he offered this motion <br />because it is in the best interest of Redwood City to have this street go through. The motion carried on <br />roll call. <br />Councilman Britschgi moved to reject all the other bids and return the unsuccessful bidders deposits, <br />seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. City Attorney Currie asked permission to proceed -with the <br />acquisition. Councilman Spillers -moved that the City Engineer be authorized to proceed with negotiations <br />with the State for the $30,000 in the gas tax fund, seconded by Councilman Granger. This was followed by <br />P� discussion in regard to ac uistion costs <br />g q , precautionary action regarding the $30,000 set aside in the gas <br />6+ tax fund and availibility of the additional $5,000. The motion carried. <br />WEED ABATEMENT COMMITTEE RECOP,RulENDATTON REGARDING SPREAD OF COST FOR SPRAYING POISON OAK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. <br />It was the unanimous opinion of the Committee that the City should not pay for the cost of spraying poison <br />oak on private property. The following recommendations resulting from the meeting are submitted for the <br />Council's consideration: <br />1. That the City only assumes the cost of spraying on City owned property, which is <br />a very small portion of the area affected. <br />2. That property owners assume the cost of spraying on private property where poison <br />ask is found. (Mr. Throckmorton stated that the maximum cost should not exceed $20 <br />per 100 linear feet.) <br />3. That when the Weed Abatement Resolution is adopted for the coming fiscal year, <br />there be included in said Weed Abatement Resolution a provision for the elimination <br />of noxious and dangerous weeds, which would include poison oak. <br />The cost of this would then be apread in the same manner as is now being done with the abatement of weed, <br />raw payment being made by the owner of the property benefited. Councilman Britschgi moved approval of the <br />bow report, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried. <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED FENCING UNION CEAM,,RY. The City Manager's report stated that he had <br />reviewed his files and found that on May 24, 1955, the Purchasing Department mailed two sets of plans <br />Flo, and specifications, together with cost estimate for erecting 2519 linear feet of chain link fencing for <br />�.. Union Cemetery, to the Chief of the Division of Buildings and Grounds at Sacramento. He was informed that, <br />while both Mr. Justin Child, Chief of the Division of Buildings and Grounds, and Mr. Jerry Olrich, State <br />Gardener, recommended that the -amount of our estimate, which was the sum of $5.A 84.09, be appropriated for <br />this purpose, that the State Legislature has denied this reguest. Councilman Granger moved that this be <br />carried on the agenda for thirty days, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. Councilman Granger stated that <br />he based his motion on the fact that the Cemetery Association agrees with this. Motion Carried. <br />