Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />199 <br />called study meetings. My concept of study meetings are that they are indicated for the sole purpose of <br />exploring and analyzing problems that are to be decided in regular legislative sessions and not for the <br />purpose of making any final determinations or decisions. I do not believes that it is proper to transact <br />any business whatsoever at such study meetings or to dispose of them without formal action in open rgular <br />meeting. I have raised this fissure on several occassions - my point of view has no changed - I still <br />deplore transacting any of the public's business in any other than open public meeting. <br />All of this leads me to the point that if this community is to be properly served by its elected representatives, <br />it appears that we shall have to devote a little more time and energy to its business. The volume and <br />complexities of problems have grown to such an extent that it is incumbent upon us to meet in formal open <br />regular legislative sessions or meetings more frequently than is the present practice. The fact that at <br />this date there are some 25 or more items now pending that have been before this council during the past <br />two months and have not as yet been properly disposed of, should be more or less conclusive. If we do <br />not take action our back log will necessarily continue to grow, with the sad result that matters will be <br />disposed of in a haphazard manner .to clear the docket. I would certainly deplore such action and enter <br />strenuous objections. <br />To avoid such a possibility I now move that the City Attorney be directed to prepare and submit by Mondays July <br />9, 1956, draft of an ordiance setting the time and place of holding regular, meetings in these chambers at <br />8:00 P. Pd. of every Monday and Wednesday of each month. Further, that when a Monday or Wednesday falls on <br />a legal holiday then the meeting shall be held on the next following business day; that appropriate pro- <br />visions should be included for the calling of special meetings and study meetings; that the press shall be <br />advised al all meetings in writing at least forty eight hours in advance; that the notice to the press in <br />the case of special or study meetings shall indicate clearly the topic to be the subject of such meetings; <br />that at special or study meetings no other matters than that indicated in the call for same shall be taken <br />under consideration. This motion lost for lack of a second. <br />COUNCILMAN WEISS REPORT REGARDING UNIFORPd SALES TAX ACT. Councilman Weiss read the following report: <br />Sales tax, <br />1. The question of a city and county sales tax to conform with the Uniform Sales Tax Act, commonly called <br />the Bradley -Burns Act, has been under dicussion and exploration for some tine. <br />2. In order to bring the matter into proer focus and so that the people of this community may have some- <br />thing concrete to study, evaluate and thus be in a position to determine the advisability of adopting <br />some suitable proposal in conformity with said Bradley -Burns Act, I suggest that we request the city <br />attorney tp prepare a suitable draft of an ordinance covering the levy, etc* of a one percent sales <br />tax. <br />3. That he incorporate in said draft of an ordinance, or by separate ordinance if necessary, provisions <br />of the allocation, etc, of revenues derived as follow: <br />a. 45% of all revenues to the general fund to cover normal operation cost of the city. <br />b. 10% of all revenues to a special fund to service the bonded indebtedness of the city, except <br />those of special revenue bonds. <br />C* 25% of all revenues to Capital Outlay projects. <br />POO d. 15% of all revenues to a special fund to service the cost of the $1,250.000 bond issue for <br />down town parking lots. <br />t.. e. 5% of all revenues to Gerneral Reserve. <br />4, That he further incorporate in said draft or ordinance, or by separate ordinance if necessary, a <br />provision that shall provide that each taxpayer on the assessment rolls of this community, who is <br />also a registered voter of the city, shall be granted an exemption of $2000, provided he can, by <br />affidavit, not later than March 3 of each year establish that he is a registered voter within <br />the corporate limits of Redwood City; that he has actually exercised his right of franchise either <br />at the last general or primary election; to further provide that only one exemption shall be <br />granted in any case where property is in joint ownership. I move that the City Attorney be <br />instructed accordinly and that said draft of necessary ordinances be submitted to the council by <br />not later than July 18, and that copies be furnished to each member of the Council and the press* <br />Councilman Royer asked that Councilman '7leiss not make his motion now and asked that he turn this peport over <br />for a study meeting because the Assistant City Attorney is checking into this matter. Councilman Granger <br />moved that the matter of the $23000 exemption be placed on the agenda, seconded by Councilman Spillers and <br />c-.rried. This matter will be set for a study meeting for a week from Thursday. <br />