My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1956
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1956
>
CC MIN 1956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 1:34:09 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 10:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1956
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
201 <br />crossings. This was included in the motion after which there was discussion in regard to a letter being <br />written to the Soutzern Pacific Company telling them that the City crossings. This was included in the <br />motion after which there was discussion in regard to a letter being written to the Southern Pacific <br />Company telling them that the City did not intend to Day for Jeffersor, Avenue and Maple gates since the <br />Southern Pacific removed gates some years ago. Councilman Stout requested the City Manager to hold the <br />rIft letter until he writes a lotter to the Southern Pacific Company. Police Chief Faulstich stated that <br />*.■ original letter was from the Public Utilities Commission and not the Southern Pacific Company. The Public <br />0 <br />Utilities Commission requested the .list of priorities. This was followed by discussion. Councilman <br />Stout's motion was restatad by the Mayor that the priority list be accepted, seconded by Councilman 'rdeiss <br />and carried. <br />TRAFFIC COIvZ=TE E RECOMMENDED 20 MINUTE GREEN ZONE FOR A DISTANCE OF NINETY FEET IN A SCUTHER.LY DIRECTI iN FROM <br />BRADFORD STREET 0:1 THE EAST SIDE OF �'r,4RRET1 STREET, And a distance of seventy-four feet in an easterly <br />direction from 1,7arren Street on the South side of Bradford Street (new R. G -L E. BUILDING). Councilman <br />Spillers moved approval of the Traffic Committee's recommendation, seconded by Councilman "Ireiss and carried. <br />TRAFFIC CO 211ITTEE RECOI 4END TIUZEE ADDITIONAL ONE :TOUR TIETERS BE TNOTALLED IN FRONT OF THE PLACES OF BUSINESS <br />LCCATED AT 711-715 T,,.�4IN STREET. The location of these three meters would be on the south side of Main <br />St(ireet, a distance of seventy feet east of the loading zone located in front of 715 Main Street. City <br />Attorney Currie stated that this should be subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works. <br />Councilman Spillers moved approval of the Traffic Committee's recommendation subject to approval of the <br />Department of Public Works., seconded b� CounciLman Britschgi and carried. <br />THE ASSOCIATED ENGTIdSERS, INCORPORATED, CONTRACTOR PUTTING IN THE 12" CAST IRON ti�AT.FR MnITd, BROAD'�tr.Y TO'"hiIPPLE <br />A;'ENUE, RE(TUESTED All, EXTENSIOIJ IF THE COIJTRACT TIME on this project of an additional 15 working days. <br />Mater Superintendent Winter stated that they did not start the job soon enough, however, he believed they <br />+ were working along all right.at the present time and he suggested that they not award the extension at <br />this time but wait until the job is finished. Councilman Spillers moved approval of the Water Superintendents <br />recommendation, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried, Councilman Granger voting No. <br />Councilman Stout spoke on the subject of subdivision fees. He submitted the following figures securred from the <br />Building Inspector:, <br />January 33 single dwellings <br />February 67 single dwellings <br />2 duplexes <br />2 apartments <br />March 9 single dwellings <br />6 duplexes <br />3 apar Lments <br />April 9 single dwellings <br />7 duplexes <br />Pool May 8 single dwellings <br />bow 7 duplexes <br />June 18th 108 single dwellings <br />7 apartments <br />The total units if figured at $100 each would produce #32,533, if figured at $75.00 each the total would be <br />rnm $24075. Therefore, Councilman Stout moved that any and all permits for single family dwelling, apartments, <br />i.. multiple dwelling units or rentals fissured by the Building Inspector as of now be subject to any subdivis- <br />ion fee that may hereafter be adopted by the City Council. City Attorney Currie stated that there is no <br />harm in this proposal, however, he qestions the legality of the situation. Councilman Stout added to his <br />motion that they add if legal. This was followed by discussion. Councilman 7,leiss .seconded the motion. City <br />Attorney Currie stated that at no time did he give a legal opinion on the matter. Legally he questions <br />this. This was followed by discussion. The motion lost on roll call vote with Councilmen Britschgi., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.