CC MIN 1956 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

tat ADOPTION OF CRDINANCE NO. 600.73, REZONE LOT 173, WELLESLEY PARK from R-1 to R-3. Affidavit of publication was oredered filed. .There being no protests, written or oral, Councilman Herkner moved hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. Councilman Weiss moved adoption of Ordinance 600.73, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried on roll call, Councilmen Britschgi, Granger and Stout noted absent. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 827, ESTABLISH FIRE ZONE NO. 2, OAK KNOLL AND CANYON ROAD AREA. AFFIDAVIT of publication was ordered filed. There being no protests, written or oral, Councilman Spillers moved hearing a be closed, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried. Councilman Spillers moved adoption of Ordinance 8273 second by Councilman Weiss and carried on roll call, Councilmen Britsehgi, Granger and Stout noted y absent. FINAL REPOT ON ANNEXATION AND SUBDIVISION FEES. Mayor Royer stated that Councilman Stout had presented a good report at the recent study meeting, however the council decided that facts and figures presented did not warrant changing the present fee as set up by resolution. Councilman Spillers moved acceptance of report, City Manager to assist Councilman Stout in the event he wished to carry on his studies. Motion seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried. PROPOSED REZONING OF DALE STUART PROPERTY FROM R*3 to R-2. Planning Commission failed to carry proposed rezoning, Their deliberations ending in a tie vote of 3 to 3. They then returned the matter to the Council with the recommendation that inasmuch as they failed to reach a decision, the zone be left in R-3 classification. Matter held for public hearing on Tuesday, September 11, 1956. COMMITTEE REPORT ON CONDITION OF SIDEWALKS IN 300 BLOCK CHESTNUT STREET. City Clerk read report of Council Committee, Councilmen Weiss and Stout: Your committee to explore the problem of sidewalk repairs on the 300 block•of Chestnut Street desires to submit the following report: After consideration of all possible information availablep by consultation with the Deputy City Engineer and interviews with property owners involved, we have come to the following conclusions: a. Though no written records are on file, one of the property owners was able to establish that driveway approaches did exist prior to the resurfacing of this block by the contractor, and it is self evident that they have never been replaced. That the driveways involved in front of 312021029 and 322 Chestnut Street are ' of approximately 135 square feet of area. b. That the condition of the sidewalks running in front of Lots 7 and 8, 312 Chestnut Street, Jamison property; Lot 9, 332 Chestnut Street, S. J. Miller and Lots 109 11 and 12, San Mateo County Agriculture Department property are in such condition that repairs must be had. c. That as a result of work by contractor some 25 feet of sidewalk in fron of 312 Chestnut (Jamison was damaged as a result of the work of the contractor. d. That the property owners are cognizant of their responsibility, but likewise insist on the city assuming its responsiblity for failure to require contractor to replace driveways and for portion of sidewalk damaged by said contractor. e. That because of time elapsed no recourse against contractor is now possible. Recommendations - a• That the City assume responsibility for the 4 driveways, approximately 135 sqo ft. in area as well as the 25 ft* portion of sidewalk damaged by contractor. b. That sidewalks as indicated on.rattached sketch be repaired in accordance with sidewalk ordinance at property owners expense subject to appropriate credit as indicated in "A" above, c. That the City Engineer be instructed to proceed in accordance with above recommendations under the sidewalk ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Louis Weiss and Hiram S. Stout, Councilmen Mrs. T. Carolla, representing Mrs. Jamieson, appeared stating that after meeting with the committee, certain information had come to hand which she thought should have a bearing on the matter. Estimates have been received from'�Tour contractors, and bhe was advised that if the sidewalks were built according to city specifications it would result in same being higher than property due to grade of street rising to meet.