CC MIN 1957 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

3 "First of all I wish to comment on the fact that though this ordinance before us is of great import, we have had no copies submitted for study in advance. I have repeatedly stated that I am considerably disturbed by this method of procedure. To me it is a foregone conclusion that the difficulties we are experiencing in the general administration and legislative functions of this community can readily be ascribed to the more or less hasty methods of procedure which leads to snap judge- ments on very vital questions. . The ordinance we are considering involves future expenditures in excess of two million dollars, to study it between now and the next meeting at which time it is ready for adoption could mean that we would have to postpone and republish same if it were to develop that considerable amendments were to be necessitated. The generally accepted practice in governmental procedures, involving fiscal matters, especially budgets and appropriations, is to prepare and submit a budget, and based on an approved budget to make necessary appropriations to implement the budget and provide funds for necessary operations. As matters stand, we now have before us the introduction of an appropriation r ordinance which should for all practical purposes mean that a sound budget has been adopted. The facts are that we have not yet completed our study of the preliminary budget which was handed to us on June 12th. Further, it is my belief that said is not complete in that it does not ibelude certain special funds or even all the funds carried in the appropriation ordinance before us. I am also concerned over the fact that no public hearings on the budget have been or are to be held. Such procedure, to my mind, is highly irregular, unsound and certainly not in accord with best business practice. Last year, and again just a few months ago I urged the council to take action that would permit of the orderly planning of the fiscal affiars of the community. Just because this practice has been followed in the past, and which incidentally is fast leading us to the point of no return, is no excuse to perpetuate it forever. The City Attorney has recently indicated to the Council that it is essential to introduce the appropriation ordinance by June 17th if we are to avoid a hiatus when no appropriations for the operations of the city would be available, as well as to avoid possible embarassments such a situation could create. All of this has caused me to think of what is good conscience I could do under the circumstances and yet fulfill my obligations as a councilman. Realizing that this unbusiness like procedure is of long standing and that apparently no malfeasance or misfeasance is involved, and the necessity as a matter of expendience to provide for uninterrupted operations, I have colcluded that I must once again acquiesce to this irregular procedure, but, with the distinct reservation that upon disposition [1. of the motion before us, I shall submit another motion calling for action that will eliminate or obviate, that is correct our current practices, before another year rolls around. " Louis Weiss, Councilman. This was followed by discussion as to why this ordinance was necessary and hot it differed from previous action taken during the previous years. The motion carried on roll call with Councilman Herkner voting NO. Councilman Granger suggested that at the next election they amend the Charter in an effort to change the number of days for consideration of the budget to sixty days. Councilman Weiss, no action for providing appropriations for the ensuing year is in progress but to avoid recurrence of similar irregular situation the year following, moved that the Mayor establish without delay a committee composed of two councilmen, one citizen from either the banking or financial profession, one citizen from the accounting or related professions, the City Attorney and the City Auditor; the committee to be charged with evaulating our present fiscal and budgeting procedures, the Charter and other provisions relating thereto, and make suitable recommendations for any changes, modifications or needed revisions to provide for a modern fiscal • and budgeting program. The committee should be requested to submit their report by not later than November 30, 1957, if at all practicable, so as to permit council action with a view to submission of suitable charter amendments to the electorate at the municipal elections to be held in April 1958, if found necessary. This motion lost for lack of a second. The City Attorney stated that the Council asked that he prepare an ordinance with regard to salaries and present same at the time the appropriation ordinance was introduced. He read the title of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Spillers offered introduction of an ordinance amending Sections 1, 2, 2.101 to 2.106 inclusive, 2.151