My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1979
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
CC MIN 1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2016 8:24:45 AM
Creation date
7/27/2016 4:56:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/8/1979
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
X10 <br /> SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY AND PUBLIC HEARING (continued) <br /> 1. (continued) <br /> Lengthy discussion followed and Mr. Wiltsie commented and replied to questions and <br /> statements concerning the reasons why the decision was made to separate Redwood <br /> City from the rest of the County; the fact that Redwood City shoppers in Palo <br /> Alto are probably using the Stanford Shopping Center and not the type of services <br /> advertised in the yellow pages; the fact that the Telephone Company survey showed <br /> only 5� of Palo Alto shoppers shopped in Redwood City; the fact that the proposed <br /> change was filed with the PUC in March 1978 and notice given to San Mateo County <br /> cities; the fact that the Redwood City trading area is customarily made up of r.� <br /> Belmont, San Carlos and Redwood City and that placing Redwood City in a Palo Alto <br /> director.y will cause yellow page advertisers to have to advertise in two books at '; <br /> greater cost and to a market they do not want; the historic shopping patterns in ,�,,,r; <br /> San Mateo County; the fact that yellow page advertisers are primarily tradesmen <br /> offering special services or merchandise not usually available in shopping centers; <br /> the fact that, traditionally, people shop for yellow page-type services near their <br /> homes; whether the reason for splitting the Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City <br /> trade area might be to generate increased advertising income because of the re- <br /> sultant need to advertise in more than one book; whether a survey might not have <br /> more properly been made of the desires of those who advertise in the yellow pages; <br /> the fact that the Telephone Company will offer customers a card which may be com- <br /> pleted by those requesting more than one directory; the fact that people in Menlo <br /> Park and Palo Alto may want Redwood City services; and whether the shopping survey <br /> was appropriate for determining that the yellow page directory for the County <br /> should be split. into three books. <br /> Frank X. Albert, Area Manager, Directory Service, Pacific Telephone Company, <br /> 12341 Curry Court, Saratoga, acknowledged that some do not like the rearrangement <br /> of the yellow pages, but suggested that many advertisers prefer it. Mr. Albert <br /> suggested that advertisers would be expected to spend the percentage of their <br /> advertising budget which they might expect to obtain from a particular directory <br /> area. <br /> Discussion continued and Mr. Wiltsie, and Mr. Albert commented and replied to <br /> questions regardiny the fact that Redwood City is the county seat of San Mateo <br /> County and will be listed in a directory which is primarily Santa Clara County; <br /> the fact that the smaller Contra Costa County directory has been split into <br /> three directories all of which are in the same county, although that county is <br /> adjacent to business in Alameda County, for example; and whether the Redwood <br /> City yellow pages have been combined with the smaller Palo Alto section for <br />, reasons unrelated to trade areas. <br /> It was suggested that if the San Mateo County directory has become unwieldy, � <br /> although it is smaller than that of San Francisco which is not being split, <br /> that two directories representing the actual historical northern and southern � <br />� county trading areas might have been more appropriate than splitting Redwood <br /> City out of San Mateo County and publishing three directories, <br /> f Frank Parcell, Redwood Plumbing, stated that he favors the new Palo Alto directory <br />� which wil include Menlo Park and Redwood City, because those are the cities in <br /> which he does business. He reported that his yellow page advertising rates are <br /> lower now. <br />; Frances Smith, 143 Birch, asked whether there is any plan to incorporate the <br />� areas included in the directories. She was advised no such plan exists. <br />� Dick Dodge, 140 Stratford, Redwood City businessman, said that he could appre- <br /> i ciate the desire to reduce the size of the San Mateo County directory, but <br /> would have preferred to have two books, stating that his customers are in <br />! Redwood City, Belmont and San Carlos. He stated that he will now have to <br /> I advertise in two directories to reach his market, but would have to advertise <br />� in all three to reach his former potential market. <br />� <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 12/3/79 <br />; Page 2 <br /> i <br />� <br /> I <br /> i <br /> � <br /> r.ri <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.