CC MIN 1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 � 6 } that the Planning Commission and City Council make such ; decisions. Planning Director Schroeter and Director of � Public Works Pusich also advised they had no k.nowledge ; of any sugge�ted compromise, but were willing to work ; with the landowner and developer to obtain quality de- � velopment for the City. '""" i Lengthy discussion followed and Mr. Fales, Mr. Schroeter, t��t � Mr. Pusich and City Attorney Schricker replied to ques- s tions concerning development of the sub�ect property; the history relating to the proposed zoning map amend- 3 ment; the intentions of the landowner with regard to ` development of the two smaller parcels; the desire of the City to maintain IP standards in the Veterans Boule- - vard area; whether or not Environmental Impact Reports ` would be required for development of the smaller parcels; action the City might take, if plans for development of the smaller parcel do not meet with the approval of the : Planning Commission and City Council; the requirements � of the CG Zone versus those of the IP Zone; and the � stated intent of the landowner to meet IP landscaping : and parking requirements in developing the smaller ; parcels. � Mr. Fales requested that the record state that it is ; understood tha�t the K-Mart site on the sub�ect property � will be developed first, before there is any other de- � velopment of the property. He also called attention to � his report stating that if current indications with re- � �ard to development change at any point of significa.nce •� � during the process of development, he would not hesitate to recommend re-initiation of the sub�ect rezoning. �� ; ; Mayor Weymouth invited anyone else present who wished � to speak to do so. No one present wished to address r the Council. : MOTION: Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Council- F inan Leipzig, to close the public hearing. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. The public hearing was closed at 8:�3 p.m. , MOTION: Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Council- man Rhodes, to terminate the proceedings with regard to the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map relating to property in the vicinity of Veterans Boulevard, Walnut � Street, Bayshore Freeway and Maple Street as evidence ; indicates that the two small parcels not immediately M proposed for development could not be developed to be j compatible with City plans for the area, and rezoning r would unnecessarily restrict development of those parcels. i � Mr. Schricker advised that Councilman Barrett will ab- °�"' � stain from voting since he was not a member of the City ; Council at the time the public hearing on the proposed -�� � �oning Map amendment was first brought before Council. � � � � i -3- � � Reg.Mt . � 9/�E/7� � � � , , ,,.,:.. . , ; , . , t