My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1973
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
CC MIN 1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 11:36:16 AM
Creation date
7/28/2016 12:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/2/1973
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
440 <br /> to other agencies of which the County had approximately 28 1/4% interest . <br /> It was noted that all three cities and the County should be aware of <br /> their effect on their neighbors since , if for some reason an over-capacity <br /> at one of the plants caused a violation , that could mean a cease and desist <br /> order would be issued to all cities and that portion of San Mateo County <br /> within the Fair Oaks Sewer Maintenance District , Oak Knoll Sewer Mainten- <br /> ance District , and the Kensington Sewer Maintenance District . <br /> At this point the Director of Public Works noted Page 8 of his report <br /> and the tables of comparison with the three cities in 1967 , which met <br /> the California Regional Water Quality Control Board ( CRWQCB ) requirements , <br /> in volumes and detailed from report , which were still being met . He felt <br /> that , unless the City went into some sort of industry that had very high <br /> loadings of the "BOD" and " SS " discharge per day, in which case he would <br /> recommend a detailed evaluation , and other than individual residential <br /> connections , each proposed discharger and estimated effect upon the present <br /> facilities should be examined in terms of volume which would keep the <br /> problem that much easier to understand . <br /> When indicating the approximate percentage of the actual remaining capacity <br /> of each collection system, he referred to page 15 of his report and felt <br /> that the 0 . 65% was a valid remaining limited capacity for Redwood City . He <br /> noted , however , that there would have to be a lot of inter-city cooperation <br /> between the three cities of Redwood City , San Carlos and Belmont as far as <br /> the discharge permit was concerned . <br /> The Director of Public Works briefly related how the remaining flow could <br /> be quickly used depending upon the rate of growth . He mentioned that if <br /> the City and County felt that they could not live within these limits <br /> until a new treatment facility could be constructed , then the alternative <br /> would be to make interim improvements to the existing plant . He stated <br /> that in discussing this phase with the cities involved it appeared that <br /> the best solution at this time would be interim improvements in each indivi- <br /> dual plant , which could increase capacity and which would give time before <br /> the need for the SCSP plant . For Redwood City there would be three or <br /> four possible alternatives which would range in cost from $75 , 000 to <br /> 5175 , 000 , which were first cost figures . Some of the proposals would be <br /> reusable in the proposed SCSP plant , and others would be totally non- <br /> recoverable . As the new plant had not been designed there would be no <br /> guarantee for any reusable or recoverable proposals , as , he noted , the <br /> City would not know how long the interim improvements would have to be <br /> used . <br /> 6/19/73 <br /> Adjd . Mtg . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.