Laserfiche WebLink
323 <br /> meet natural contours , and lakes put in for recreation . He noted the pattern <br /> of improvement which had been done in gradual fashion over the years , which <br /> in some cases , represents problems . He commented on the fierce pride of the <br /> residents in this area . <br /> The third map depicted the plan proposal , and reflected certain recommended <br /> policies to limit density to a maximum of two lots per acre in the City <br /> area, to contain high density development within the area where it already <br /> exists , to utilize the slope density zoning in effect in City, and where <br /> possible , to set minimum lot size at 15 , 000-20 , 000 square feet . Also , in <br /> their discussions , the Steering Committee decided that on the map , uses <br /> should be designated as what they are , such as golf course , convent , etc . <br /> Mr . Halsted indicated that presently existing open space areas were in- <br /> tended to remain as open space . He noted one employment area was desig- <br /> nated on the plan , and this would be optional for implementation : The <br /> high school site at Farm Hill Boulevard intersection with Highway 280 . <br /> He also mentioned there was one commercial area, at Canyon Road and <br /> Cordilleras , and that no other commercial area was wanted by the residents <br /> than already existed . Mr . Halsted also reported that the Committee had <br /> felt that the area along the portion of Eaton Avenue within Redwood City <br /> might well be in San Carlos , if it were looked at in an orderly way . A <br /> survey was taken involving about 60% of those residents , and they pre- <br /> ferred to stay in Redwood City . He concluded with the comment that most <br /> of the Plan evolved through trying to make everything spring from what <br /> the people wanted . <br /> Vice-Mayor Henderson then invited Staff to comment , and City Manager <br /> responded that , as Council was aware , this was the formal presentation of <br /> the proposal to be forwarded to Planning Commission for consideration , <br /> and which would also be presented to the Board of Supervisors and County <br /> Planning Commission , and would be subject to public hearings . Planning <br /> Director noted that it was worthwhile to understand at this time that <br /> this was a very important break-through in the planning process , in that <br /> it was a first joint City-County planning project . He noted that a couple <br /> of good things that grew out of this contrasted with the bad . One was <br /> that the plan was first promulgated by a few failing septic tanks and <br /> brought to a head a situation where a plan had to be developed . This <br /> plan now meets all requirements of the State General Plan . Another happy <br /> outcome was in the finding by a geological survey that , while the area is <br /> a " stone ' s throw" from the San Andreas Fault , the area West of Alameda de <br /> las Pulgas would be safer than that East of Alameda by about 10% . Possibly <br /> the most important outcome was that whereas the unincorporated area resi- <br /> dents had previously exhibited hostility, during the year ' s deliberations <br /> 3/26/73 <br /> Reg . Mtg . <br />