My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1972
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
CC MIN 1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2016 8:26:31 AM
Creation date
7/29/2016 12:07:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1972
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 1 <br /> Minutes of Adjourned Regular Meeting <br /> Redwood City Council <br /> May 13 , 1972 8 : 00 A . M . <br /> Mayor Keckley called the meeting to order at 8 : 00 A . M . <br /> ON ROLL CALL , the following were noted present : Councilmen Mary W. Henderson , <br /> Marguerite Leipzig , Robert E . Norris , William C . Rhodes , Ray A . Weymouth , <br /> James S . Williams , Mayor Paul C . Keckley and City Clerk Marian McCrindle . <br /> Also noted present were City Manager James M . Pales , Jr . , Assistant <br /> City Manager James M . Smith , City Controller Jack Ference and Deputy <br /> City Clerk Frances I . Reggetts . <br /> City Manager recommended in response to question by Mayor Keckley that the two <br /> matters on the outline agenda for consideration in the proposed budget <br /> be considered at the appropriate time within the subject in which they <br /> fell . City Manager then proceeded with the budget message , noting that <br /> portions of the early part of the message were devoted to explanation <br /> of the change in format from previous budgets , to set out by program <br /> proposals , with explanation in narrative form rather than in numbers . It <br /> was felt that this approach in making statement of policy was better <br /> since words provide better direction than numbers as explanation of a <br /> total fiscal program . This was the first year this was being attempted , <br /> and it was hoped to make certain refinements in the future . After <br /> adoption , there would next be a proposal for a 5-year Capital Improvement <br /> Program . The first year would be adopted by specific approval , with the <br /> remaining four approved in concept , and this would be on a continuing <br /> basis , so that there would always be a five -year projection of objectives . <br /> In the process of developing in future years , it is intended to build <br /> work measurements and statistics so that it will be possible to include <br /> justification data in the budget based on a historical record of production <br /> by department . In the future there would be more reference to "man years " <br /> data on expenditure of effort quantified in terms of objectives . This <br /> cannot be done effectively now , but as it goes along , that kind of <br /> comparative data can be developed so that Council would have the opportunity <br /> to measure production against whatever City is trying to accomplish and <br /> thereby make a value judgment as to when an expenditure can be justified <br /> in those terms . <br /> City Manager then reviewed the basic budget objectives : To attempt to <br /> provide for existing and on-going municipal service needs , as well as <br /> new services which are result of previously adopted Council policy . Also , <br /> initiation of new or expanded programs in areas of high priority need , <br /> and redirection of some existing personnel and resources to areas of <br /> primary municipal responsibility . It was also proposed to begin a process <br /> Adj . Reg . Mtg . <br /> 5-13 -72 <br /> Budget <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.