CC MIN 1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

47 Mzs.. Ruth Martin , 315 Sussex Way , Belmont , felt that four lots would be preferable to seven . ( Councilman Weymouth pointed out that the seven referred to concerned hous - ing unit , not lots . ) City Manager indicated that clarification of the issue before Council was necessary at this point . He noted that the City had no interest in the public improvements in that area , and this was a decision of the property owners to make . The matter to be considered was a basic land use decision , He noted that the street and the lots were sub - standard as a result of subdivision approved many years before by the - County . He referred to a portion of the Planning Commission minutes wherein Commissioner Floyd had requested a paragraph from the Planning Staff Report be read into the record , which he then read in full , Councilman Norris moved to DENY the application of Henry and Angela M . Miller to subdivide one parcel into four parcels , and asked that the statement referred to be entered into the minutes : "The proposed subdivision violates the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations in respect to access , street frontage , and minimum lot size . Two lots would have no public street frontage at all where the Subdivision Regulations require direct public street access . One lot would have 25 feet of frontage where the minimum lot frontage requirement of the Subdivision Regulations is 50 feet . According to the Zoning Ordinance , any residential frontage of less than 50 feet could provide access to only one single -family dwelling , although this proposal would have three lots dependent on this one lot ' s substandard access , " Motion was seconded by Councilman Rhodes , Mr . Gardella again commented that the deed restrictions permit only one single -family dwelling per lot , and stated that there was no way a cluster development could be built . He felt this term was synonymous with condominiums , apart - ments and the like , and did not feel this was desirable for the Emerald Lakes area . City Attorney noted two elements were involved : Action by the Planning Commission on the application for subdivision , and also a second , but concomitant negative vote by the Planning Commission with respect to exceptions , At his suggestion , Councilman Norris restated the motion to DENY the application for exceptions , and to disapprove the subdivision , seconded by Councilman Rhodes and carried on roll call vote , Councilman Williams abstaining , and Mayor Keckley being noted absent . (MINUTE ORDER #72 -108 ) Application of HARRY VASILAKOS to subdivide one parcel into two parcels with an exception to street frontage requirements , property located at 126 Inner Circle , in an "R- 1 " ( Single Family Residential ) District . Request was for resubdivision of one parcel into two parcels , with exception to permit 41 . 57 feet of frontage on a public street for both 5/22 /72