CC MIN 1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

I 2 6 PROMOTIONAL , TEMPORARY AND LIMITED APPOINTMENTS : EXTENSION OF PROBATIONARY PERIOD , AND REJECTION OF PROBATIONERS ; SICK LEAVE ; EMPLOYEE MORALE AND WELFARE ; APPEALS ; ACCESS TO RECORDS AND STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE ; AND REMOVAL OR DISCHARGE, RESPECTIVELY ; and An Ordinance repealing Chapter 23 of, and adding Chapter 23 to , the Code of the City of Redwood City , relating to the establish - ment of regulations and standards for the administration of a personnel system . Motion carried on Roll Call vote , Councilman Rhodes being noted absent , Application of JOHN GRIFFITH , to subdivide one parcel into two parcels with an exception requested , property located at M5 Myrtle Street , in "R- l " (Residential - Single Family) District . Planning Commission at their meeting of July 25 , 1972 , recommended that the exception be authorized , subject to specific conditions detailed in report to Council . Councilman Weymouth moved to adopt Resolution granting exception to certain provisions of Chapter 30 of the Code of the City of Redwood City -- John Griffith , seconded by Councilman Leipzig . Councilman Norris spoke in opposition to the application , feeling that it allowed an alley type access to a secluded rear dwelling . Councilman Williams concurred , stating that he had previously goine on record as opposing these panhandle lots and would continue to do so . He felt that Council should come to grips with the situation and say they are not going to be allowed in the future . Councilman Henderson agreed with this position , and expressed the hope that Council would take a policy position to preclude these types of developments coming before them . Councilman Weymouth felt that if Council intended not to permit panhandle lots in the future , Planning Commission should be so informed . He also indicated that while panhandle lots were undesirable , there were situations where this type development was the only solution, so it was difficult to set hard and fast rules . Mr . Warren Weinstock , representing the applicant , Mr . Griffith , agreed that many of the panhandle subdivisions were atrocious , but felt that was not true in this case . 8/7/72 Reg . Mtg .