CC MIN 1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

X41 456 Main Street , one -story wood frame dwelling , 894 sq . ft . - other buildings across Main Street are wooden sheds , dilapidated fences , storage containers and debris on property . The appraised value of the garage is $2 , 550 ; Assessed Value is $640 . The appraised value of the dwelling is $3 , 300 , Assessed Value is $825 and the other structures appraised value of $1 , 450 and Assessed Value of $362 . County Assessor ' s records indicate the permanent buildings to have been erected sometime between 1910 and 1920 . The Application of these proceedings and the docu - ments have been filed with the City Clerk for the record , relating to the inspections that were made and the notices given to the owners of the property . The Building Department initiated inspection procedures considering the obvious deterioration of the structures , and permission from the owners was requested to inspect the premises and prepared the subsequent reports , In company with Mr . Salaman and Fire and Health Department Inspectors the necessary inspecns were performed . Compilation of the inspection reports were forwarded to the owner requesting an action for self-abatement of the deficient conditions . Further conference with Mr . Salaman was held and the Department requested specific detailed assurance and owner commit- ment to self-abate the nuisances by July 31 , 1972 . The Department , not having received a formal program for owner-abatement by July 31 , 1972 , posted the buildings with "Notice to Abate Nuisance " on August 1 , 1972 . The consideration to the current construction costs and the age and extensive number of deficiencies of the buildings in question , led to the Department ' s opinion that rehabilitation is not economically feasible . Clean-up and demolition costs for all constructions involved are estimated between $2 , 000 and $2 , 500 . The recommendation , due to the extensive degrees of substandardness and unsafe conditions as outlined , is abatement by demolition . In answer to Councilman Norris ' question regarding the statement in the report to Council that abatement by rehabilitation was not possible because of its location in Fire Zone No . 1 , Chief Building Official Gyselbrecht stated that because the buildings are so badly deteriorated it is just not feasible to rehabilitate them at all . If the owners chose to reconstruct the buildings and call it rehabilitation , they would not be permitted to reconstruct the building with the type of materials as used now , and would have to be in compliance with construction requirements for Fire Zone No . 1 . 8/14/72 Reg . Mtg .