Laserfiche WebLink
253 <br /> as a matter of policy is the proper one for El Camino Real , and that their <br /> standards should be changed for this project . <br /> Mayor Keckley announced that he had had a request from property owners <br /> and merchants along El Camino that Council reopen the public hearing <br /> and asked for a reaction by the Council . <br /> Councilman Leipzig moved to reopen the public hearing, Channelization <br /> and Traffic Signal Modification Project , El Camino Real , Whipple Avenue <br /> to Oak Avenue , from the Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 6 , 1972 , <br /> seconded by Councilman Henderson and carried . <br /> (MINUTE ORDER #72 -219) <br /> City Attorney brought to the Council ' s attention that the record of the <br /> public hearing had been left open at the close of the last public hearing <br /> of December 6 , 1972 , for the purpose of receiving documentary material <br /> which was identified as : <br /> Public Exhibit #2 - Mr . & Mrs . Henry Morrello ' s letter . <br /> Dated November 6 , 1972 . City Clerk <br /> stamp date November 7 , 1972 . <br /> Public Exhibit #3 - DeGeller & Michalski , Realtors . <br /> Letter Dated December 2 , 1972 , <br /> Public Works stamp date December 5 , <br /> 1972 . <br /> Public Exhibit # 4 - Mr . & Mrs . Louis B . Dematteis . <br /> Letter Dated December 13 , 1972 . <br /> Public Works stamp date December 14 , <br /> 1972 . <br /> Public Exhibit #5 -- Letter from Public Works to <br /> Mr . & Mrs . Louis B . Dematteis , <br /> Dated December 15 , 1972 . <br /> Public Exhibit #6 - Mutual Realty ' s letter . Dated <br /> December 12 , 1972 . City Clerk <br /> Stamp date December 13 , 1972 , <br /> Public Exhibit #7 -- Ken Whipple ' s letter . Dated <br /> December 12 , 1972 . City Clerk <br /> stamp date December 18 , 1972 . <br /> Mayor Keckley invited the public to be heard , <br /> Attorney Robert Costello , representing about 72% <br /> of property owners involved , elaborated on his <br /> clients ' concern regarding the on- street parking <br /> phase of the project . He brought to Council ' s <br /> attention that his clients would much rather have <br /> less parking spaces on a permanent basis than more <br /> parking spaces on temporary basis . They would <br /> like to be assured that there has been sincere <br /> effort on the part of the Staff and Council to <br /> maximize reduction in the areas such as sidewalks , <br /> median widths , lane widths and parking lane widths <br /> to the extent consistent with safety . That traffic <br /> laws be agressively enforced . They felt that if <br /> something can be accomplished with less effort , <br /> cost , money , or inconvenience they would want to <br /> try it that way . His clients felt that signaliza- <br /> tion coordination would be helpful . He suggested <br /> that Council and other businessmen form a repre - <br /> sentative committee to address the issues that <br /> have evolved since the last public hearing . <br /> property owners are asking Council to take the <br /> project step by step , not to rush into a premature <br /> decision tonight , and allow the hearing to remain <br /> open , at least until the negotiations with the <br /> State have occurred . <br /> 12/18/72 <br />