CC MIN 1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4i8 representatives of Woodside High School to determine if the school playing field could be made available for the exhibition . Vice Mayor Keckley stated that he understood this had been resolved . Bob Anderson , 432 James Avenue , representing the Condor Club , advised that during the past week he had been in touch with the Principal of Woodside High School , and use of the field was approved for the two days , and an agreement signed . He added that they hoped that for future exhibitions they could get together with Council so as to avoid this kind of problem . Vice Mayor Keckley suggested that they make their request early enough , and give consideration to dates so as not to be in conflict with Little League , or June wedding receptions at the Community Activities Building . Councilman Rhodes advised that because of the successful efforts of Councilman Henderson in the Club ' s behalf, it had been unnecessary for the Liaison Committee to meet . Councilman Henderson expressed the hope that the Mayor or Vice Mayor would express Council ' s appreciation to Mr . Hutchinson for consideration shown both to the City and to the Club , and that the Club appreciated this highly desirable location . She also indicated she understood the ,group intended to make an effort to make the residents aware prior to this event . (Memo 2 - 16. 72 ) Fat_ r Oaks Neighborhood Center Advisory Board . City Manager ' s report indicated the HUD Citizens Advisory Committee intended to recommend Council appointment of an Advisory Board for the Center without benefit of an election . Prior to that Council had received a report outlining procedure for the election -appointment of the Neighborhood Center Advisory Board , providing : a ) division of the target area into six districts ; b ) interested residents within each district to file nominating petitions with not less than twenty- five signatures ; c ) establishment of a polling place in each of the six districts , and d ) that the name of the person receiving the most votes in each district would be submitted to the City Council for formal a.pnoi-ntment . City offered logistic a. sistance . Election scheduled for January 27 , 1972 was recommended by the Nei_ hborhood Development Council to be postponed and filing date for candidates extended , but an election was never held . Because of an apparent conflict in opinion as to whether the Board should be by election , or by Council appointment , City Manager recommended that , to provide as broad an involvement of the target area as possible , and because Council appointment might seriously divide the neighborhood and cloud the good intentions of an appointed Board , consideration be given the following : 1 ) Council reaffirm the election concept ; 2 ) Council request the Neighborhood Development Council to administer the election , with any assistance desired provided by the City ; 3 ) Council approve a proposed guidelines with regard to the Advisory Board . 2 - 14-72