CC MIN 1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

164 The compulsory and binding arbitration features of the bill would have the effect of removing from elected representatives of local communities the power to make virtually all decisions regarding matters of employment of local peace and safety officers , and give that power to an individual who , by definition , would not be responsible to the electorate , nor responsive to the electorate ' s needs . Impact of such provisions is evident by reference to City ' s own budgetary concerns ; i . e . , approximately 90% of increases in this year ' s budget reflect increase in cost of employee services . League of California. Cities estimates the bill would remove the decision making authority of three -fourths of the local operating budgets from elected representatives . Furthermore , the bill is patently discriminatory in that it pertains solely to local policemen and firemen . Proponents argue that it provides protection to local peace and safety personnel because they are prohibited from striking . However , this ignores the fact that municipal employees have , in fact , engaged in strike activities throughout the State . The bill eliminates any motivation on the part of unions representing peace and safety personnel from engaging in good faith bargaining . Experience in other States has shown bills of this nature do not eliminate strikes , and result in minimal bargaining efforts by unions in anticipation of excessive arbitration awards made without regard to ability of the local agencies to bear such burdens . Senator Dills , author of SB 333 , had stated at the Legislative Institute , sponsored by LCC , that he was not convinced the League leadership reflected the cities ' attitude , and Committee felt the record should be set straight that the League in fact did reflect the views of its member cities . Remarks of the Senator reflected the views of the lobbyists , who were almost exclusively composed of PORAC , the peace officers union . There is increasing disenchantment with this union , and some of the local peace officer associations of the Cities of San Francisco , San Diego and Los Angeles , and the Sheriff ' s Department in Los Angeles County, have broken away from this group . The Committee fully supports the right of peace officers to organize , and encourages better- ment of working conditions at the local level by local action, giving due regard to the general welfare of the community and burdens placed upon the taxpayers . The Committee strongly recommended opposition to SB 333 , and requested that a copy of the report be delivered to the San Mateo County Council of Mayors at its meeting of May 21 , and that copies be sent to all State Senators , Assemblyman Arnett , and the League of California Cities with a letter stating Councils position on this bill . Attached to the report were : LCC Legislative