Laserfiche WebLink
214 <br /> addition to advising appropriate legislators of City ' s position , it was <br /> recommended City of Belmont also be advised of Council ' s action . <br /> 3 . Limitations Upon Land Dedications . AB 52 would provide that a City not <br /> require a property owner , as a condition of granting a zoning variance , <br /> conditional use permit or other permit , or exception , to dedicate all or <br /> a portion of property to the city for street widening purposes without <br /> payment of compensation for such property . Copy of resolution adopted by <br /> City of Belmont opposing AB 52 was referred by Council to the Committee . <br /> Committee felt that legislation prohibiting such dedications would unduly <br /> hamper flexibility of local government to meet burdens imposed upon traffic <br /> conditions by effectively prohibiting dedications in connection with develop - <br /> ment of local properties . Further , such legislation may well have a dampen - <br /> ing effect on owners ' enjoyment of private property to the extent munici- <br /> palities may be compelled to deny applications for variances , use permits , <br /> etc . due to unavailability of funds to meet proposed requisite compensation . <br /> Committee recommended opposition and also recommended City of Belmont be <br /> apprised of City ' s position . <br /> 4 . Legislations Affecting Building and Construction . Recommendations on several <br /> legislative items were submitted to Committee by the Chief Building Official . <br /> ( a ) SB 1141 . Would amend Section 17922 of Health and Safety Code to require <br /> no State or local agency shall authorize use of any wiring method that <br /> does not provide raceway protection for electrical conductors . Com- <br /> mittee concurred with recommendation of Building Official to oppose <br /> SB 1141 . <br /> (b ) AB 1113 . Would establish minimum standards of strength and resistance <br /> to tampering for locking devices for use in residential and commercial <br /> structures . Committee concurred with recommendation of Building Official <br /> to oppose AB 1113 since its effect would be to give preferential treat- <br /> ment to certain manufacturers without accompanying benefit by way of <br /> increased security . <br /> ( c ) AB 1176 . Would require geological reports be submitted in connection <br /> with processing of subdivisions . Building Official and Committee <br /> recommend support of AB 1176 . <br /> ( d ) SB 530 . Would create California Earthquake Office , to apply and direct <br /> application of new technology to earthquakes and earthquake related or <br /> concerned activities . <br /> Committee recommends opposition to SB 530 as being premature , in view <br /> of the fact Legislature has created a Joint Committee on Seismic <br /> Safety, and the Seismic Safety Group is in process of reviewing seismic <br /> safety requirements for the purpose of recommending appropriate <br /> legislation . <br />