Laserfiche WebLink
215 <br /> ( e ) SB 601 . Would substantially revise provisions of last year ' s AB 399 <br /> which City opposed on recommendation of the Committee , which estab - <br /> lished certain requirements and control over manufacture and use of <br /> safety glazing materials . Committee ' s concerns over AB 399 appear <br /> to have been justified , in that confusion and difficulty have been <br /> experienced both by affected private industries , and governmental <br /> agencies in administering the subject law . Committee concurred with <br /> Building Official recommendation to support SB 601 in attempt to <br /> eliminate such confusion . SB 601 had passed the Senate , and it was <br /> recommended correspondence regarding the bill be sent to appropriate <br /> Assembly committee , as well as to City ' s legislators . <br /> ( f ) SB 624 . Would require that city or county official charged with <br /> carrying out and enforcing specified provisions relating to certain <br /> housing and buildings ( i . e . , building officials ) be a registered <br /> civil engineer . Committee believed that such requirements would <br /> impose excessive expenses upon local entities without reaching the <br /> apparent goals of such legislation . Committee recommended opposition . <br /> ( g ) SB 692 . Would require adoption by State Department of Public Health <br /> of rules and regulations relating to minimum standards for noise in- <br /> sulation of new buildings intended for human habitation , and of <br /> alternate stricter standards which may be adopted by local governments . <br /> Although Building Official recommended opposition , Committee believed <br /> "noise pollution " is an environmental factor which requires governmental <br /> action in the absence of adequate private regulation and specifications . <br /> Committee recommended support of SB 692 . <br /> ( h ) SB 778 . Would require city or county building departments to maintain <br /> official copies of plans of buildings for which permits had been <br /> issued . Committee concurred in recommendation of Building Official <br /> and recommended support . Bill had passed the Senate , and it was <br /> recommended that City ' s position be communicated to appropriate <br /> Assembly officials . <br /> ( i ) SB 352 . Would require that plans for hospital construction and <br /> alteration be made by a structural engineer and licensed architect , <br /> establish earthquake resistant standards for hospitals , and provide <br /> for approval of plans and specifications of such construction and <br /> operation by Schoolhouse Section of the Office of Architecture and <br /> Construction in Department of General Services . Bill would place <br /> hospital construction in much the same category as schoolhouse <br /> construction with regard to building requirements and regulation . <br /> Committee agreed with Building Official that such controls should be <br /> extended to all construction where personal injury or loss of life <br />