CC MIN 1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

251 Councilman Weymouth moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO . 6584 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF JEFFERSON BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS - COMMUNITY PARK CONDUIT, AND STULSAFT BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS . MISCELLANEOUS STREET CULVERTS , PROJECT NO . SD-14 , GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 1-65 ; AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR SAID WORK ; AND DIRECTING RETURN OF SECURITY DEPOSIT, seconded by Councilman Williams and carried on roll call vote , Councilmen Petersen, Weymouth , Williams and Mayor Bury voting yes ; Councilman Henderson and Rhodes voting no , and Councilman Keckley being noted absent . Councilman Petersen moved to introduce Ordinance adding Sections 20 . 97 . 2 and and 20 . 97 . 5 to Article VII of Chapter 20 of the Code of the City of Redwood City , relating to parking restrictions on Marsh Road and Rolison Road , seconded by Councilman Henderson . Staff report indicated that Rolison Road and Marsh Road were designed as two-lane roads with a parking lane only on the side fronting residences . A miniature golf course fronts on the "no parking " side of Marsh Road , and occasionally , cars are parked on both sides of Marsh Road when the miniature golf course is busy , and on both sides of Rolison Road when the curb parking is full on one side . The Ordinance would provide authority to cite vehicles parked illegally, and was recommended by the Traffic Committee . In the dis- cussion , Councilman Henderson felt residents of the area affected should be made aware of the proposed restrictions . In the response by Staff, it was pointed out by Traffic Engineer that when the State built the freeway , they also built Rolison Road (parallel to the freeway ) , and that the ordinance was simply a means of effecting prohibited parking which should have been in force from the beginning . Deputy Policy Chief noted that parking on any travelled way is illegal , but in this case had never been posted . He also indicated that the lane was used mostly by visitors to this area , and not the residents . Motion carried . Termination of contract for installation of Peninsula and Bridge Parkway Fencing- Section 2 , and authorization for issuance of change order to contract for Landscape Project, Peninsula-Bridge Parkways - Section 1 , General Improvement � p ent District No . 1-64 . An architects error in preparation of contract documents for the installation of parkway fencing, Bridge Parkway Section 2 and Peninsula Parkway Section 2 , had resulted in necessity to terminate the agreement with the general contractor , who had agreed in writing to the termination . In order to accomplish the necessary fencing work and to coordinate the existing contract work for Peninsula and Bridge Parkway Landscaping-Section 1 , it was proposed that a change order be issued