My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1971
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
CC MIN 1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2016 12:52:41 PM
Creation date
8/1/2016 8:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/18/1971
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
268 <br /> by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call vote . <br /> Mayor Bury noted the presence of Mr . Sam Halstead ( Consulting Planner <br /> and Engineer of Eco -Management , Division of Public Services , Inc . , <br /> who was coordinating the development efforts ) . <br /> LAUREL WAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 2 <br /> Staff report indicated that on August 18 , 1969 , Council had <br /> authorized preparation of plans and specifications for these <br /> improvements by Frahm , Edler & Associates , as well as acquisi - <br /> tion of slope easements , etc . City Manager advised that follow- <br /> ing the last information clinic for the proposed district , the <br /> people in the area indicated a desire to try to bring the matter <br /> to a conclusion , one way or the other . The assessments to be <br /> charged to the individual properties would be furnished the <br /> owners prior to the public hearing . He noted that Mr . Philip <br /> Assaf , attorney for the proposed district , as well as Mr . Ted <br /> Cannis , of Frahm , Edler and Associates , were present to respond <br /> to any questions by Council . <br /> Mr . Assaf described the several resolutions to be acted upon , <br /> and the function of each . <br /> In response to question by Councilman Keckley , Mr . Cannis in- <br /> dicated that the assessment spread was in conformance with unit <br /> basis determined by unit of benefit , and was consistent with the <br /> City ' s Zoning Ordinance and Planned Development provisions . <br /> Councilman Henderson advised that she would be absent from the <br /> meeting on October 18th , the date proposed for the public hearing . <br /> Mr . Assaf advised that the proceeding was under constitutional <br /> powers , and that a U/5ths ( 6 Council members ) affirmative vote <br /> was necessary for adoption . If there were not at least six mem- <br /> bers present , it was his recommendation that the public hearing <br /> be opened and continued until such time as full Council could be <br /> present . <br /> Councilman Weymouth moved adoption , seconded by Councilman Williams , <br /> of the following Resolutions : <br /> RESOLUTION NO , 6599 OF PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION AND OF INTENTION - <br /> LAUREL WAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO , 2 ; <br /> RESOLUTION NO , 6600 OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER ' S REPORT - <br /> LAUREL WAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO , 2 ; <br /> RESOLUTION NO , 6601 APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.