CC MIN 1970 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

256 In Account 468, Equipment Replacement Services, additional data had been requested concerning request for Backhoe Loader, and Assistant City Manager advised he had asked the Superintendent of Buildings to submit review of this item. The report indicated City had taken delivery of the present equipment in 1949; that it is used for excavation and backfilling, is averaging four repairs per month over the past six months, and due to long use has reached the point that malfunctions cannot be corrected with an overhaul. Recommenda- tion was that it be replaced. It was determined in the discussion that the age of the machine was less of a factor than extent of operation, and it was noted that while the machine is down for repairs, the crew is forced to stand by. Councilman Weymouth moved to retain the Backhoe Loader in the Keckley budget ($20,000) seconded by Councilman Weymeuth. Motion carried, Councilman Arnett and Henderson voting no. The request for 1 Fire Engine in Account 468 was again discussed, and Council- man Arnett moved that it be deleted, seconded by Councilman Henderson. Councilman Weymouth indicated his support for approval of this item was based on Fire Chief's comments at earlier meeting, as well as concern for safety of the City, and Councilman Keckley agreed, because of the long lead time for delivery. Mayor Bury felt that repairs of the present equipment were urgently needed, but was concerned that they might be delayed if there was a — prospect for a replacement. There was discussion as to effect of not ordering the engine on fire rating. Assistant City Manager indicated this would not be jeopardized, unless it was necessary to take the engine out of service. Motion to delete item of 1 Fire Engine ($55,000) carried on roll call vote, Councilmen Arnett, Henderson, Rhodes and Mayor Bury voting yes, Councilmen Keckley, Petersen and Weymouth voting no. There was a brief discussion concerning Marina Revenue account and it was pointed out that while revenues might increase due to change in rates, the funds must remain in this account, unless there is specific approval by the State. The matter of discussion of personnel was explained by Mayor Bury to require consideration in Executive Session if other than of a general nature. Councilman Arnett noted that savings realized by approval of City Manager's recommendation for position deletions would amount to $81,366, and questioned what could be expected in savings through projected attrition. He felt it may be necessary to consider layoffs in addition, and indicated _ 27 positions for elimination which he projected at a saving of $2703000. Councilman Petersen indicated concern as to the effect on a department of