Laserfiche WebLink
318 <br />the business was dependent on loading and unloading access. He felt by signalization <br />and elimination of left turn lanes, parking space could be retained, and this would <br />give the store time to find an alternative. <br />Police Chief then presented a slide showing an alternate solution which retained <br />parking at the furniture store, while still providing left turn pocket. However, <br />he emphasized that the recommendations of the Traffic Committee were based primarily <br />on what would provide good movement of traffic. It was noted by Council that a <br />considerable amount of traffic turns off at Arguello in order to avoid congestion <br />and that this results in a heavy volume of traffic through a residential area. In <br />response to indication by Council that signals at Arguello were unnecessary, Police <br />Chief noted that unless turns were prohibited at this intersection, turns would con- <br />tinue to be made, whether there were signals or not, and noted that with Industrial <br />Road being overburdened, additional routes become established. A recent survey showed <br />also that a large number of drivers turn at "A" and "B" Streets between Stafford and <br />Arguello. Discussion involved projections as to the length of time the improvements <br />were anticipated to be adequate before further changes would be required, including <br />the possibility of one-way streets, Police Chief indicated that such traffic pro- <br />jections are extremely difficult to make, that continuing studies are being made, and <br />that factors such as connections to the proposed State college and further development <br />in Redwood Shores are taken into consideration. It was estimated that the recommenda- <br />tions proposed for Whipple Avenue might serve for approximately five years. <br />The ultimate solution would involve grade separations to get traffic through with <br />off ramps, but would mean expenditures in millions of dollars. <br />Council expressed concern relative to increased volume of routing through the resi- <br />dential streets of the area, and stop signs were suggested to place some control on <br />speed, Police Chief advised that they try to avoid use of boulevard stops in residen- <br />tial areas, unless increase in traffic volume warrants it, <br />After <br />further <br />discussion, <br />Councilman Keckley <br />moved to approve <br />proposed <br />Plan B (modi- <br />fied <br />alternate <br />to original <br />Traffic Committee <br />recommendation), <br />seconded <br />by Council- <br />man Weymouth, <br />Mrs. Wessa, 1942 Whipple Avenue, expressed concern regarding access <br />to driveway. <br />In response, Council suggested that elimination of parked cars next to this drive- <br />way would be an advantage. <br />Mr, Henry Wessa, 1942 Whipple Avenue, did not believe traffic on <br />Whipple Avenue was heavy enough to warrant changes, and indicated <br />objection to cutting back curbs since it would reduce the lot depth <br />further, He felt the solution would be to improve the traffic flow <br />on El Camino by adjustments in timing between traffic signals, <br />Police Chief advised their recommendations did not include curb setbacks, and it was <br />noted by Council that "Plan B" did not include widening, or the removal of sidewalks. <br />