CC MIN 1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

P ) t� substantiating the viewpoint of the District that future disposal operations should result in land acquisition and development for a regional park and recreational area under public ownership . The " first and favored alternative " recommended by Committee summarized as follows : Coun ty should assume responsibility for disposal operation ; disposal operation to be conducted in a manner designed to provide a regional recreation facility under County ownership and operation ; expansion of the service area of disposal site to in- clude other communities in San Mateo County ; equitable arrangements to be made for disposition of District ' s assets at time of dissolution of District ; extension of Use Permit for a period adequate to accomplish necessary agreements . He defined equitable disposition of District ' s assets to be conveyance of fixed assets , consisting of 25 acres of land and equipment , to the County and distribution of li - quid assets . Cash on hand recommended for return to cities pro- rated on basis of total amount paid in taxes during life of the District , City ' s share being 35 . 993% of $ 149 , 591 , 03 paid . He reviewed the " secondary alternative " recommended by Com- mittee , should County be unwilling to assume function of the District , or a plan for distribution of assets cannot be achieved . ( See "Ad hoc committee " report dated May 5 , 1969 , City Clerk ' s file - South County Disposal District ) , Mr . Herkner pointed out the several suggestions which he had personally submitted for Committee ' s consideration , In view of the fact this Committee recommendation is to be presented to the District Board of Directors on May 19 , and lack of time for a full Council Committee review , Councilman Rosselli moved to accept report submitted and Staff be requested to review and submit recommendations at Council ' s adjourned meeting on May 15th , seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried . Mayor Bury asked that recommendation of the Committee as submitted by Mr . Herkner , together with a summarization of his own recommendations be submitted to Council . ( MINUTE ORDER #69- 88 ) PUBLIC HEARING , Appeal of MOBIL OIL CORPORATION from denial by the Planning Commission of their application for a Use Permit to allow the establishment of an automobile ser- vice station on the Northeast corner of Veterans Boulevard and Main Street , being a portion Lot 3 , Block 1 , Motor City Subdivision , an unsubdivided triangular parcel having 180 feet of frontage on Veterans Boulevard , and 216 feet of frontage on Main Street , owned by the McKelvy & Lazzarini Investment Corporation , declared open and affidavits of publication and mailing ordered filed . - . Planning Commission report read in full , stating Commission had voted unanimously to deny the application for a Use Permit , particularly noting that , prior to taking action on the Use Permit application , the Commission had considered granting the Use Permit subject to certain conditions , as customary in considering service station applications , but applicant , through its representative , served notice they were un- willing to comply with the first proposed condition ; namely , " that an Architectural Permit be obtained in accordance with Article 45 of the Zoning Ordinance " and requested approval or disapproval by the Planning Commission without further delay . Staff report read advising of continuance of hearing requested by the applicant in order that Architectural Committee might further review plans for proposed develop- ment and of this Committee thereafter reviewing the revised plans and indicating to IN 12 '69