CC MIN 1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

325 before financing , but if able to obtain this Mobil property will endeavor to do something interesting with this block , pos - sibly a six story building . Councilman Rosselli stated before making motion to close public hearing , he would ask that applicant indicate his willingness to work again with the Architectural Committee in an endeavor to submit plans which might be found acceptable to both themselves and City . Mr . Hart assured Council of their willingness to work again with the Architectural Committee and also that if not able to work out planning to satisfaction of both , will not make a further appeal . . On this basis , Councilman Rosselli moved to close the public hearing , seconded by Councilman Arnett . Councilman Keckley questioned propriety of an Architectural Committee member taking plans home for further review or additional design suggestions as was noted by applicant . City Attorney advised that as this was one with the consent of ap - plicant he could see no objection . Motion carried , City Attorney also , as matter of clarification , defined the two ways Council might return this matter to the Planning Commission or Architectural Review Committee , one being to reverse the action of the Planning Commission and grant the Use Permit and refer matter back for Architectural review , other method being holding appeal open by continuing this public hearing and pending appeal refer back to Planning Commission and/or Architectural Committee for further recommendation . After further discussion on possible procedure techniques , Councilman Weymouth moved to reopen the public hearing , seconded by Councilman Arnett and carried . Councilman Rosselli thereafter moved to continue this public hearing to July 14 , 1969 , and during the pendency of appeal request a recommendation from the Planning Commission on basis of new representation made by applicant at this meeting , seconded by Councilman Petersen . Councilman Henderson expressed opposition to continuing public hearing and referral back to Planning Commission and/or Architectural Review Committee , as felt it had been clearly indicated this is not an appropriate site for a gas station and that Use Permit should be denied . On question , Councilman Keckley felt it should be made clear that Council intended no directions to either Planning Commission or Architectural Review Committee on changing their respective standards , but instead , to allow Mobil Oil Corpora - tion another chance to present revised planning which might be acceptable both to them and to the City . Motion carried on roll call vote , Councilman Henderson voting no ( MINUTE ORDER #69 -89 ) PUBLIC HEARING , Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commission to amend the Zoning Map to rezae from " IS " ( Interim Study ) District to " RH " ( Residential -Hillside ) District , the property known as " EDGEWOOD ROAD NO . 1 ANNEXATION" having frontage on Edgewood Road , Cordilleras Road , and Upland Road ; being Lots l9 , 20 , 22 , B . Co and D , Johnson Subdivision , declared open and affidavits of publication and mailing ordered filed . Report of the Planning Commission recommended Zoning Map be amended to rezone property from " IS " District to "RH " District . Report of the Planning Staff read describing area of approximately 4.4 acres of land recently annexed to Redwood City , more than half of area us, a •Bs