Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> Councilman Keckley moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO , 6147 APPROVING CONTRACT DOCUMENTS <br /> AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 1969 -1970 DEWATERING PROGRAM FOR REDWOOD CITY GENERAL <br /> IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO , 1 --64 ; AND, AUTHORIZING CITY CLERK TO CALL FOR BIDS <br /> THEREFOR , seconded by Councilman Rosselli . <br /> Councilman Henderson inquired whether program is substantially the same as in <br /> the past , or expanded from last year ' s , and Mr . Reiter advised program will now <br /> include dewatering and maintenance ; that maintenance included at this time to <br /> insure lower rate in event grading at levee is to be done . Dewatering will be <br /> minimal , since less area is now in raw state ; more of the project is being <br /> drained by storm drains , and while the moratorium situation exists , no more <br /> than necessary will be done . Going to bid at this time will enable prices to <br /> be available . <br /> Council questioned whether funding would be more appropriate under M & 0 than <br /> under reclamation bonds , and City Manager advised that if it develops that <br /> maintenance work is done , the matter can be reviewed and , if <br /> appropriate , charges could then be made against M&O . Motion carried on roll <br /> call vote . <br /> Councilman Arnett moved to adopt Resolution approving and authorizing execution <br /> of supplementary agreement between City and Bert A . Betts and Associates , <br /> seconded by Councilman Weymouth . <br /> i <br /> Councilman Arnett requested a review of the circumstances of the original <br /> agreement . City Manager stated agreement provided for lump sum payment of <br /> $7500 upon completion of the report , and added the request for supplementary <br /> agreement is initiated by Staff and not by the consultants concerned , because <br /> of substantial out -of -pocket expenses incurred in travel between Redwood City <br /> and Sacramento , as well as several meetings . <br /> The agreement does not provide for expenses in addition to fixed fees , and the <br /> $7500 payment will not be exceeded . Staff recommendation is to amend original <br /> agreement to allow payment of 55 , 000 upon submittal of preliminary report , with <br /> the balance to be paid upon acceptance by Council of the final financial report . <br /> He pointed out further that , in other contracts executed by the City, provision <br /> is made for periodic progress payments as services are performed , up to a certain <br /> point . <br /> Responding to concern that this might set a precedent , City Attorney assured <br /> Council that City is obligated to pay $7500 and nothing more in this first <br /> phase . <br /> Councilman Weymouth agreed that reimbursement of out -of -pocket expenses is valid <br /> request , but felt agreement should provide for an advance , but only on submittal <br /> showing difference between advance and balance held . It was felt the intent <br /> of the agreement should be clarified , and Councilman Henderson moved to refer <br /> back to Staff for redrafting , seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried . <br /> ( MINUTE ORDER #69 -219 ) <br /> 01 `4 161 <br />