CC MIN 1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

312 proposed resolution asks only name of stocks , property owned within influence of Redwood City , disclosure of joint venture partnerships , but does not require dis - closure regarding private residence . Opponents expressed opinion State bill would be far more adequate than local legislation . It was recommended that the resolution be reviewed by the Legislative Committee , after study of the Unruh bill and comparison with State legislation on this sub - ject . Councilman Arnett moved to refer the matter to Legislative Committee so that comparison can be drawn between the Assembly bill and this proposed resolution , and report submitted , seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried . ( MINUTE ORDER #69-78 ) Appointment to unexpired term on Park and RecreationCommission was deferred from meet - ing of April 21 . After balloting , Councilman Arnett moved to appoint Larry Schenck to the vacancy , seconded by Councilman Henderson and carried . ( MINUTE ORDER #69- 79 ) , Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt ORDINANCE NO , 1399 AMENDING ORDINANCE N0 , 623 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FIRE ZONES IN THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY , seconded by Council - man Arnett and carried on roll call vote , Councilman Henderson voting no . DAMAGE CLAIM : Dr , Robert G . Turner , 1690 Woodside Road , Redwood City , for property dam- age alleged to have been caused by City employees during street surfacing work , denied and referred to insurance carrier on motion of Councilman Petersen , seconded by Councilman Arnett and carried . (MINUTE ORDER #69-80 ) Report on results of special 1969 population census was presented by Planning Director , who advised that in, addition to the State ' s census questions , ten additional ques - tions were added by the Planning Commission and entered on computer print - out cards . Reason for census was that basis for State contribution of in - lieu taxes to County was the 1966 population figure , and it was believed this figure was underestimated , and it was necessary for the entire County to be continue in order to benefit from new figure . Each city participating had its own census made , and cost of conduct - ing the census was largely underwritten by the County . Population of Redwood City was found to be 53 , 858 . Graphs were shown indicating comparison of population be - tween 1950 , 1960 and p resent , extent of change in division of age groups over several years , and he reported on the results of the supplemental questions asked , such as length of residency of head of household , proportion of persons living in Redwood City who also work here , number of owners as proposed to renters , etc . , and how this com pared with 1960 census . Planning Director reported that the State Department of Finance had been willing to update by estimates based on '''housing unit counts " but experience indicated aver- age household population was decreasing , and State will no longer accept this basis if figure is more than 3 years old . Council expressed interest in receiving copies of the graphs for further review . Planning Director explained data was " raw " and stated they would like time to put the material in final form . Further , that it was intended to continue to search out persons not previously counted . Mayor Bury requested that a report be prepared at an early date . City Manager commented that if the population has declined , State will permit us to use 58 , 200 figure for 2 years . After the Federal census in 1970 , if figure is below 58 , 200 lower figure will have to be used . n9