My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1934
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1934
>
CC MIN 1934
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 4:28:50 PM
Creation date
8/26/2016 4:08:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1934
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
92 . <br /> life incident to accidents at such crossings . Cou .cilnnn Jones stated his opinion that <br /> gates were nnzch better than any other kind of signals at grade crossin=;s . Finally , Coun- <br /> cilman Fletcher offered resolution protesting to the State t,ig_i ray Commission the closing <br /> of any of the four streets mentioned . The motion to adopt the resolution was carried , <br /> with McCarthy . tt r fi The y was with Counclinan MCt voting No . The City Attorney was asked to prepare appropriate <br /> argument and represent the City at the hearing in San Carlos , Thursday morning. Carl <br /> Stoner mania-dented the discussion of the Council , stating-; that it was an absolute neces- <br /> sity to combat this closing with actual data, and indicated the willingness of his Company <br /> to cooperate with the City . <br /> The Council took up again at this time the report of the Citizens ' Advisory Board concerning <br /> the desirability of acquiring the Electric Public Utility. Councilman McCarthy spoke at <br /> some length concerning the advisability and the profit of acquiring this utility and urged <br /> the Council to get the matter started. Councilman Eva stated he had not made un his mind <br /> either for or against such a -project , but thought it best not to spend the money necessary <br /> to make any evaluation of the physical property of the P . G. cs E . , affectin~ the Electrical <br /> portion , until some effort had been made to ascertain whether or not the people of Redwood <br /> City desired such acquisition . In this he was supported by Councilmen Fletcher . Louis <br /> JenI:ins , Jr . , appeared before the Council to protest subnittin~; such a protosal and offered <br /> certain figures to support his argument . W . 0. Tyson also indicated that he was not in <br /> favor of it . Councilman McCarthy proposed, seconded by Councilman Jones , who considered <br /> that the acquisition of such a utility would be a profitable venture , that the City take <br /> the first step toward acquiring this property by havin`, the Railroad Commission evaluate <br /> the physical property of the Electric Utility. The motion was carried four to three , <br /> Councilmen Christensen, Eva and Fletcher voting "No " . <br /> W . 0 . Tyson asked for certain information concerning the cost and location of the Tennis Courts <br /> at Mezes Plaza, and reply was given him by the City En7ineer and Cotitacil ^,n McCarthy . <br /> On motion of Councilman Jones , seconded by Councilman McCarthy , the City Manager was instructed <br /> to proceed with the work of surfacing the Tennis Courts on the 'High School grounds pro- <br /> vided the School Trustees furnish the material . <br /> Councilmen Jones said he had been told that if the City levied any special assessment for the <br /> payment of 1915 Act delinquencies , that no citizens of Redwood City could obtain the <br /> benefit of the Home Owners ' Loan Act . The utter was referred to the City Attorney to <br /> see Attorney Yorrisey who , i t was said, had made the statement . <br /> The City Treasurer as':I:ed the Council to select the Special Auditor for the ensuing year as the <br /> end of the quarter was near. On motion of Councilman Jones , seconded by Councilman Chris- <br /> tensen , it was decided to retain C . G. Uhlenberg for another year at his proposed price <br /> of $425 . 00. <br /> The Clergy_ read a long coaunication from the 1915 Improvement Bond Act Corinittee and a report <br /> from the special counsel appointed by this committee . The correspondence told of the <br /> present status of the litigation and of certain points which hnd to be cleared up , to— <br /> ;ether with recd inendations to be followed by the cities . It was requested that each <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.