My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-11-07 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-11-07 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 1:27:05 PM
Creation date
11/3/2016 4:10:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/7/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 29 <br /> <br />inability to capture respondents for each of the different transportation modes (i.e. pedestrians, <br />bicyclists, transit users, and drivers). <br /> <br />OBJECTIVE 11: <br />Increase feelings of comfort and safety for all roadway users <br />Why: Farm Hill Boulevard and Jefferson Avenue serve important roles within the community and <br />neighborhood – both connecting people to regional destinations (jobs outside the city, airports, etc.) <br />and to local ones (park, places of worship, neighbors, etc.) – and people should feel safe using it. <br /> <br />Measurement: The intercept survey described above collected data on perceptions of comfort and <br />safety of people using Farm Hill Boulevard and Jefferson Avenue. <br /> <br />Similar to Objective 11, an intercept survey was performed in July 2016 after the pilot to collect <br />information on the change in feelings of comfort and safety for all roadway users. However, since the <br />respondents in the Post-Pilot surveys were different respondents than the Pre-Pilot, this data was not <br />used for the evaluation, but is provided in Appendix A for reference. <br />Summary of Evaluation <br />Multiple performance measures set forth by the City were evaluated. Table 31 summarizes the <br />measures and key findings for each. Generally, the pilot project achieved the desired goals of the <br />project, excluding the increase in emissions and congestion, as well as the reduction in transit ridership. <br />It should be noted that the emissions and congestion are two measures that are correlated since the <br />congestion and the emissions increased due to the increase in vehicle demand. The reduction in transit <br />ridership is not necessarily due to the project itself since there is no direct correlation and the overall <br />transit system ridership also decreased from May 2015 to May 2016. <br /> <br />It should also be noted that the amount of diversion of traffic to alternate routes is inconclusive because <br />the number of vehicles on each corridor, including the project corridor increased. This increase in <br />vehicle demand is typical of the increase in vehicle demand and traffic congestion in the general area, <br />as shown by the increase in volumes along I-280. <br /> <br /> <br />8.A. - Page 40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.