Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Richard Audsley, Planning Commissioner, 146 Atherwood Avenue, Redwood City <br />Nita Spangler, 970 Edgewood, Redwood City <br />Ralph Nobles, Planning Commissioner, 3720 Country Club Drive <br />Gus Pappas, 587 Seahorse Lane, Redwood City, who suggested a maximum of <br />three architects with remaining members from the citizenry <br />would give the committee a better overall approach <br />Carl Kriletich, 70 Foss Drive, Redwood City expressed concerns regarding the <br />establishment of another committee. <br /> <br />Title read. MIS: MurraYIBuchan <br />RESOLUTION NO. 11497 ESTABLISHING ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Carried by unanimous roll call vote. <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />c. Water Rationing Status Report and Recommendations (1204-09) <br /> <br />Report: <br /> <br />General Services Director, March 19, 1991 <br /> <br />Councilman Greenalch presented the staff report and thanked his fellow <br />members on the Water Committee: General Services Director Sennewald, <br />General Services Supervisor Stevè Mitchum and Council Members Buchan and <br />Bury. Councilman Greenalch responded to Councilman Claire's concerns <br />describing alternatives considered by the committee; the 60% outside and 10% <br />inside plan that has led to 25% conservation; per capita 50 gallonlper <br />resident and its impacts; commerciallindustrial options including large <br />users such as hospitals, schools and parks; banking; impact of irrigation <br />meters reduced to 90%; excess water use charges to discourage over usage; <br />penalties for willing abusers; need for public relations; nature of <br />recommendations to Council in Water Committee report; gathering of data has <br />not prejudged the issue; but, Council needs to decide which of the <br />recommended approaches to put forth. <br /> <br />Councilman Claire asked for the following specific information: <br /> <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br /> <br />Description of California Water Service plan, pros and cons. <br />Description of San Francisco Water Plan, pros and cons. <br />Description of sliding scale plan, pros and cons. <br />Impacts of building moratorium <br />Costs of replacing fields and parks <br />Reclaimed water usage and cost <br />Report on water used by people who exceed their allotment <br />Per capita allotment (has been presented) <br /> <br />MEMO 3/26/91 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting Minutes <br />March 25, 1991 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 50 <br />Page No. 208 <br /> <br />'T <br /> <br />"""-"'-"---"'.-T--'."""'~-"'" ",_."",."", """,-----"-"'-'- <br />