My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1966 282.13 to 300_ 9-12 cont to 9-26-1966
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1966
>
1966 282.13 to 300_ 9-12 cont to 9-26-1966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 11:39:01 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 11:05:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/5/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
293 <br />Councilman Granger, upon recommendation of Staff, City Attorney and DMJM moved to <br />adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5150 AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO LESLIE PROPERTIES, INC. IN THE <br />AMOUNT OF $425,953 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3, ORDINANCE NO. <br />1128, SECONDED BY Councilman Bury. <br />— Staff report stated funds were to be reimbursed from District 1-64 Bond Funds, <br />On question Councilman Henderson asked which General Plan was referred to in <br />claim submitted. <br />Mr. Jim Reiter advised General Plan referred to was <br />General Plan report. <br />— Councilman Henderson questioned further breakdown of figures and how to be allo- <br />cated against each of five measures. <br />Auditor -Accountant reported work in question specifically on <br />reclamation would be charged to reclamation, and other charges <br />would be allocated to each of bond issues in proper ratio. <br />Councilman Henderson asked that report be made showing which amounts were being <br />charged to each facility. Councilman Henderson stated she would vote no for the <br />same reasons she had opposed the bond sale. (Memo 9/20/66) Motion carried on <br />roll call vote, Councilman Henderson voting no. <br />Councilman Henderson asked for further information on the Belmont Slough fill and report <br />on status of seismic recorders. City Manager reported seismic recorders were <br />expect ed to be delivered in about 10 days and because housing for instruments <br />would cost less than $2000 it would not be necessary for Council to approve. <br />Councilman Henderson further questioned Belmont Slough dredging; the amount of <br />fill involved in the bid; and referred to the reference in the Feasibility Report <br />to "imported" fill for dikes. <br />Mr. Reiter replied not possible to follow Feasibility Report in <br />all detailed respects as changes do take place when further study <br />makes another application necessary. <br />Councilman Granger moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5151 BEING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION <br />TO VACATE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, INCLUDING RIGHT TO ENTER FOR MAINTENANCE <br />AND CLEANING OF CHANNEL, IN LOTS 10 AND 11 OF EMBARCADERO SUBDIVISION, seconded by <br />Councilman Bury. (Sets public hearing for October 24, 1966) <br />Staff report stated this was requested by Melvin S. and Ruth J. Koppel. It was <br />further explained in an exchange of property between Ad -Apt Corp. and the City, <br />City reserved a drainage easement and rights of access for creek cleaning purposes, <br />and since the creek channel has been realigned this easement is no longer needed. <br />Motion carried on roll call vote. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5152 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIOIJ <br />FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAINS OR LINES IN CERTAIN AREAS OF BAY ROAD, FINGER <br />AVENUE AND LATHROP STREET PURSUANT TO GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2-65, PROJECT <br />W-2; AND AUTHORIZING CITY CLERK TO CALL FOR BIDS THEREFOR. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.