Laserfiche WebLink
293 <br />Councilman Granger, upon recommendation of Staff, City Attorney and DMJM moved to <br />adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5150 AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO LESLIE PROPERTIES, INC. IN THE <br />AMOUNT OF $425,953 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3, ORDINANCE NO. <br />1128, SECONDED BY Councilman Bury. <br />— Staff report stated funds were to be reimbursed from District 1-64 Bond Funds, <br />On question Councilman Henderson asked which General Plan was referred to in <br />claim submitted. <br />Mr. Jim Reiter advised General Plan referred to was <br />General Plan report. <br />— Councilman Henderson questioned further breakdown of figures and how to be allo- <br />cated against each of five measures. <br />Auditor -Accountant reported work in question specifically on <br />reclamation would be charged to reclamation, and other charges <br />would be allocated to each of bond issues in proper ratio. <br />Councilman Henderson asked that report be made showing which amounts were being <br />charged to each facility. Councilman Henderson stated she would vote no for the <br />same reasons she had opposed the bond sale. (Memo 9/20/66) Motion carried on <br />roll call vote, Councilman Henderson voting no. <br />Councilman Henderson asked for further information on the Belmont Slough fill and report <br />on status of seismic recorders. City Manager reported seismic recorders were <br />expect ed to be delivered in about 10 days and because housing for instruments <br />would cost less than $2000 it would not be necessary for Council to approve. <br />Councilman Henderson further questioned Belmont Slough dredging; the amount of <br />fill involved in the bid; and referred to the reference in the Feasibility Report <br />to "imported" fill for dikes. <br />Mr. Reiter replied not possible to follow Feasibility Report in <br />all detailed respects as changes do take place when further study <br />makes another application necessary. <br />Councilman Granger moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5151 BEING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION <br />TO VACATE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, INCLUDING RIGHT TO ENTER FOR MAINTENANCE <br />AND CLEANING OF CHANNEL, IN LOTS 10 AND 11 OF EMBARCADERO SUBDIVISION, seconded by <br />Councilman Bury. (Sets public hearing for October 24, 1966) <br />Staff report stated this was requested by Melvin S. and Ruth J. Koppel. It was <br />further explained in an exchange of property between Ad -Apt Corp. and the City, <br />City reserved a drainage easement and rights of access for creek cleaning purposes, <br />and since the creek channel has been realigned this easement is no longer needed. <br />Motion carried on roll call vote. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5152 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIOIJ <br />FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAINS OR LINES IN CERTAIN AREAS OF BAY ROAD, FINGER <br />AVENUE AND LATHROP STREET PURSUANT TO GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2-65, PROJECT <br />W-2; AND AUTHORIZING CITY CLERK TO CALL FOR BIDS THEREFOR. <br />