My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1966 395-408 _ 12-12 cont to 12-20-1966
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1966
>
1966 395-408 _ 12-12 cont to 12-20-1966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 11:34:14 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 12:48:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
407 <br />fact the County will need 22 times the present facilities to meet the needs by 1990. <br />Mr. R. H. Sciaroni of the Open Space and Conservation Committee gave an inventory <br />of the resources within the County which are worthwhile saving and urged preser- <br />vation and conservation of prime lands. He spoke of the beneficial effect of open <br />space on air pollution problem. He stated that the greatest amount of property <br />available for park and recreation use lies in the coastal areas of the County and <br />pointed out that property prices are much less in that area than on the Peninsula <br />proper. <br />Mr. Cecil Marmont of Half Moon Bay spoke on the subject of Beaches. He stated that <br />the most important recreation resource of the County is the 52 miles of coastal <br />shoreline, 15 miles of which are now in public ownership in San Mateo County. He <br />recommended that an additional 23 miles of shoreline be made available to the public <br />including acquisition of access to the beaches. He explained the lack of, and need <br />for, over -night camping facilities in this County. Specifically, he said, we need <br />picnic areas, bathing beach areas, barbecue areas, educational preserves, wildlife <br />areas. <br />While he recommended that we attempt to promote State acquisition of beach frontage, <br />he was not hopeful that the State would be in a financial position to do so, and <br />therefore urged that cities acquire any beach frontage within their jurisdiction <br />and encourage development of private beaches for public use under strict controls. <br />In speaking of the agricultural nature of the coast lands, he said the County might be <br />able to buy development rights, giving access to some of the beaches, and maintain <br />the open space while allowing agriculture to continue use of the land backing the <br />beaches. <br />Mrs. Nita Spangler representing the Historic Sites Committee, reviewed the objects <br />of the Committee as shown in the written report submitted. During her review of <br />the existing historic sites in San Mateo County she suggested that all communities <br />should appoint a historian, as has Redwood city, in order to preserve the local <br />history and color. She discussed some of the famous landmarks and the standards <br />which should govern the designation of a landmark. She urged that the work of the <br />Committee be continued. <br />Larz Anderson, Assistant County Planning Director, spoke on the subject of costs of <br />meeting the park and recreational needs for the residents of San Mateo County. He <br />reviewed a possible 5 methods of financing the program and discussed the agencies <br />who should participate in the costs. Some of the methods suggested were: trading <br />off surplus property with private owners and public agencies; joint use of facili- <br />ties; zoning control and tax concessions, encouragement of private enterprise to <br />provide recreation. He stated the estimated cost of a long range program to be 92 <br />million dollars for land acquisition, 41 million dollars for land development, total <br />133 million dollars. The short range plan, hopefully dated 1970, would require the <br />expenditure of 46 million dollars in land acquisition, 20 million dollars for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.