My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1967 Jan to Dec
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1967
>
1967 Jan to Dec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 2:54:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1967
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
indicated an additional 10' right of way along the frontages of the incorporated <br />area from Oak Knoll Drive up to the St. Matthias Church property for a future <br />widening of Canyon Road to an ultimate right of way width of 601. Report also <br />stated St. Matthias Church property had already dedicated 10' of width along <br />the Canyon Road frontage, and that proposed plan line would affect six property <br />owners along Canyon Road. <br />Joe Hanlon, 567 Canyon Road, questioned amount of <br />property proposed to be acquired from property owners <br />along this frontage; why from one side only, and <br />questioned plans proposed below this section of roadway. <br />City Manager advised that the other side of Canyon Road is outside of City's <br />jurisdiction and that proposed action for setting plan lines on City's side will <br />conform to set backs required by St. Matthias Church and meant to control future <br />construction development as to setback lines. Proposed Plan Lines are designed <br />to ultimate view of widening Canyon Road to 60 foot width, from present 40', 10' <br />setback lines from each side of the street. <br />Discussion held as to whether this matter should be referred back to Planning <br />Commission for purpose of contacting County to see if Plan Lines could be set for <br />side of street within their jurisdiction, or advantage of City's taking action <br />and notifying County of action desired to set complete Plan Lines for this sec- <br />tion. There being no communications or oral protest, Councilman Henderson moved <br />to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried. <br />Councilman Bury moved to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 5343 ESTABLISHING OFFICIAL PLAN <br />LINES FOR THE WIDENING OF CANYON ROAD BETWEEN OAK KNOLL DRIVE AND CORDILLERAS <br />ROAD, seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried on roll call vote, Councilman <br />Rosselli being noted absent. <br />Councilman Granger requested that this subject in general be referred back to <br />Planning Commission to see if County would now establish similar plan lines on <br />the opposite side of this street. <br />City Manager stated he felt same thing could be accomplished by Staff notifying <br />County of Council's action and suggesting that they take similar action to effect <br />complete plan lines on this street. (Memo 4/18/67) <br />City Manager requested that Council's proposed action for approved plans and specifi- <br />cations, and authorizing call for bids, for construction of signalization, channelir <br />zation and lighting, Veterans Boulevard 150' East of Main Street, etc., be <br />deleted from this Agenda because Staff had not been able to completely finalize <br />same. Mayor Herkner announced this item would be on Council's Agenda for next <br />week. (April 24th) (Memo 4/18/67) <br />PUBLIC HEARING, Appeal of John F. Mylod on behalf of John Boudreau, from denial by <br />the Planning Commission of his application for a variance to Section 9.6, 9.7 <br />— and 9.9(b), Ordinance No. 1130, to permit a single family dwelling on a lot <br />having a lot area of 2750 sq. ft. instead of the required 6000 sq. ft.; <br />23 <br />AFR A9 %, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.