Laserfiche WebLink
45 <br />Road, plus acquisition of property around the site. <br />Councilman Henderson asked how the objectives and policies of City had been <br />determined and was advised that such Council action as the adoption of the Down- <br />town plan, and similar expressions of Council goals had provided guidelines. <br />Councilman Henderson also questioned intent concerning staging and financing plans <br />— for development of project. <br />City Manager advised of the funds that had been placed in reserve for past several <br />years in a General Building Fund which would provide funding for the first phase <br />of corrections to the Corporation Yard, and which he had recommended in the current <br />budget; however, this would be reported on by City's financial consultants in con- <br />sidering the all-over development program. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to accept the Report and direct the Staff to report <br />back with recommendations for staging and financing, seconded by Councilman Keckley. <br />Councilman Bury asked whether Consultants would be available for further ques- <br />tioning and was advised by City Manager their services were considered terminated <br />with submittal of this Report. Mayor Herkner questioned recommendation intended <br />for Chamber of Commerce building, and was advised of the relocation recommenda- <br />tion made in the report, but decision needed by Council on such matters. <br />Councilman Henderson asked whether copies of the Report would be available for <br />public review and was advised Reports would be made available in public library, <br />Chamber of Commerce, and City offices. (Memo 5/2/67) <br />Councilman Petersen questioned whether extra costs would be involved if EBS con- <br />sultants were asked to appear again for further clarification and questioning of <br />the Report, and was advised by Mr. Davis this could be covered within reason. <br />Mayor Herkner asked if Council would recommend a special meeting for further dis- <br />cussion of this subject matter, as had been indicated. City Manager suggested such <br />a meeting be held after conclusion of Budget Study meetings, which delay would <br />also give Stone & Youngberg an opportunity to give a financial report at a special <br />meeting. Motion carried, Corneilman Granger requesting that the Report as accepted <br />be made a part of the record. (MINUTE ORDER #67-77) <br />Presentation of proposed Budget for 1967-68. City Manager advised proposed Budget <br />being submitted for Council's review prior to the series of Budget Study meetings <br />— which had been scheduled, which he recommended be held in the new Community Activi- <br />ties Building. City Manager read in full his Budget message, analyzing proposed <br />Budget as submitted to Council. (For full text see City Clerk's file - Budget <br />1967-68) <br />Councilman Bury moved to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 5351 SETTING TIME AND PLACE OF <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 1967 - JUNE 30, 1968; <br />ORDERING PUBLIC NOTICE BE GIVEN OF SAID HEARING AND OF THE FACT THAT COPIES OF <br />SAID PROPOSED BUDGET ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY <br />CLERK (sets public hearing June 19, 1967) seconded by Councilman Rosselli and <br />carried on roll call vote. <br />W W <br />