Laserfiche WebLink
would leave considerable time for any amendments to be <br />adopted on the P -Combining District for giving City <br />stricter control and urged rezoning requested not be <br />delayed at this time. <br />Councilman Henderson expressed her preference for delaying action on requested <br />rezoning until after Subdivision Map presented and approved and the proposed <br />amendments to the P -Combining District had been completed, particularly in <br />view of having understood several tentative maps had been submitted and then <br />withdrawn. <br />Mr. Johnson stated Tentative Map had not been withdrawn. <br />City Attorney advised zoning, whether to that requested, or some other type <br />of zoning, was essential before processing of a Map was possible. Councilman <br />Rosselli favored granting requested rezoning as he felt it did comply with <br />all previous proposed planning, and that Staff had indicated necessary safe- <br />guards of control were satisfactory. He also cited importance of a planned <br />development for this project. <br />Councilman Bury„ in view of Staff report and unanimous action taken by the <br />Planning Commission for recommending requested rezoning, moved to close the <br />public hearing, seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried. <br />Councilman Bury moved to introduce Ordinance adding Section 60.4.3 to Ordinance <br />No. 1130, the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance, rezoning property within the <br />Redwood Peninsula Area, seconded by Councilman Rosselli. On question, Coun- <br />cilman Henderson again opposed granting requested zoning until a Subdivision <br />Map had been approved and until the P -Combining District had been clarified. <br />Councilman Bury stated his review of reports submitted would indicate control <br />under P -Combining District was possible. Planning Director stated P -Combining <br />District does allow latitude but does have control also, and offers:a modern <br />tool for planning which should be maintained. Motion carried on roll call vote <br />Councilman Petersen being noted absent. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commission to rezone from <br />IS (Interim Study District) to PO (Professional Office District) the Sequoia <br />Hospital property, and from PO -T (Professional Office - Transient Residential <br />Units Combining District) to PO (Professional Office District) the Sequoia <br />Annex property, declared open and affidavits of publication and mailing ordered <br />filed. <br />Report of the Planning Commission was read in which it was stated, after a <br />public hearing was held on April 25th at which no protests were received, the <br />Commission had voted unanimously to recommend that the Council rezone the <br />Sequoia properties as stated. Report of the Planning Staff read in which it <br />'- was stated Sequoia Hospital, a quasi -public use, was recently annexed into the <br />City, site containing an area of 11.27 acres of land with one main multi -story <br />structure with parking areas. The other additional site of two acres contain- <br />ing a building that is in present use by the Hospital as a convalescent hospi- <br />tal, a quasi -public use, previously used for the same purpose but only recently <br />wtv 15 •s7 <br />