1967 Jan to Dec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Councilman Rosselli stated he still felt house should have been moved prior to this time to take the pressure off of the slide area, even if the house had to be moved onto another empty lot. Councilman Henderson moved to accept Staff recommen- dation and grant the extension for Sixty (60) days, seconded by Councilman Keckley. Councilman Bury stated he felt a performance bond should be required to insure compliance with conditions of this house moving. City Attorney advised this was a provision of the present Ordinance for protection of City streets, but that a bond could also be required where it was felt necessary to insure compliance. City Manager stated a $5,000 performance bond had been requested in this instance. Councilman Petersen questioned further details concerning the performance bond. City Attorney advised a bond normally set to support an agreement, but if defaulted in this instance, City would not get the amount of bond refunded, but only damage which resulted, and in this instance, no damage could be claimed at this point. City Attorney also stated the house could still be requested to be removed by the existing permit and extend period for completion of remodeling. City Manager indicated his approval of City Attorney's recommendation that would require moving of the house on existing permit by May 27th and extension of time be granted for 60 days to put the house in an approved habitable condition on the new site. Paul Tessendorff questioned ownership of lands on the slide area and stated he felt a fence should be placed on the site. Councilman Bury suggested it might be well to consider a forfeiture penalty in future house moving actions. After further discussion and intent of Council's action in granting the extension after recommendations made, Councilman Henderson restated her motion to grant the sixty (60) day extension for reconstruction of the house, subject to the house being moved before the expiration of the present house moving permit, May 27th. Restatement of the motion accepted by the Second of the motion and carried on roll call vote, Councilman Rosselli voting no. (MINUTE ORDER #67-94) Councilman Keckley moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5364 ACCEPTANCE OF REVOCABLE PERMIT FROM SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPARTMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS FOR GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRCCT 1-65, PROJECTS SD -11 AND SD -12, seconded by Councilman Bury. Staff report stated these rights-of-way are needed in connection with Projects SD -11 and SD -12, GID 1-65, where the creek improvements will cross the Hetch- Hetchy rights-of-way in the vicinity of the intersections of Redwood Avenue and Ebener Street, and Vera Avenue and Dickey Street. Motion carried on roll call vote. Councilman Petersen moved to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 1312 AMENDING SECTION 25.8 OF, AND REPEALING SECTIONS 25.9, 25.10 AND 25.12 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY RELATING TO MEETINGS OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION (authorizes changing of Commission's meeting location from Veterans Memorial Building to Community Activities Building) seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried on roll call vote. COMMUNICATIONS: Park & Recreation Commission communication reporting action taken by their Commission that Redwood City adopt the "red rose" as the official flower of the City. 71 WAS '8i