Laserfiche WebLink
88 <br />Councilman Petersen questioned the liability of individual Councilmen in case <br />of legal action. The City Attorney stated the City Council is covered, that it <br />would be the obligation of the City Attorney to defend each Councilman, if the <br />suit resulted from any action taken in their capacity of City Councilmen, and <br />that any resulting costs would be an obligation of the City. After further dis- <br />cussion of the points raised, Councilman Henderson moved to accept the Non -Depart- <br />mental Budget, noting the concern of the City Council for a review of the insurance <br />(Memo 5/24/67) seconded by Councilman Bury and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #67-106C) <br />The City Reserves were next considered. Staff explained to the Council what the City <br />Reserves consist of: - 1) The General Budget Reserve required by the Charter in <br />the amount of $250,000 which was being re -appropriated; 2) An Emergency Reserve <br />which is needed to supplement the General Reserves during the "dry period", of <br />which $150,000 is being reappropriated and to which the City Council by its action <br />at the meeting of May 17th, had added $25,000, bringing this Reserve to a total <br />of $1755000; 3) A Contingent Reserve called the "Budgeted Reserves" in the <br />amount of $•]25,000 from which the City Council appropriates needed sums during <br />the fiscal year for items which could not be anticipated and budgeted individually <br />during the preparation of the Budget. The total of these three Reserves is <br />$550,000. <br />There was a prolonged discussion as to the use and character and need of each <br />of these Reserves. The action of the Council on May 17th, in adding $25,000 to <br />the Emergency Reserve, which constituted the amount used during the 1966-67 Bud- <br />get for the costs of controling the Farm Hill slide, was reviewed. It was sug- <br />gested that inasmuch as the earth removed from the slide area was placed on City - <br />owned property, thus enhancing the value of that property, this could justifiably <br />be considered a Capital Improvement and expense be met from Sales Tax Capital <br />Improvement Funds. <br />The City Attorney assured the Council that this provision could be made in the <br />Ordinance adopting the Budget. <br />Councilman Bury moved that the third Reserve of $125,000 be reduced to $50,000, <br />and to take thei.$25,000 which Council had added to the Emergency Reserve out of <br />Sales Tax rather than General Fund money. Councilman Petersen stated that while <br />he had been opposed to any change in the Sales Tax formula, he considered that this <br />action was justified on the basis of the enhancement of the value of the City <br />property which had received the fill, and for that reason would favor-i payment for <br />the fill from Sales Tax. <br />Councilman Henderson pointed out that the money used for removing the fill had <br />come out of the General Fund and suggested that, if the City places a $25,000 value <br />on the fill, it might be necessary to include a payment to the original owners of <br />the fill. Staff assured the Council that the cost of any fill is not in the dirt <br />W 24 '6t <br />