Laserfiche WebLink
from the San Mateo County Title Company and was included in the report revealing 95 <br />Yean T. Chin and Lucille Chin to be the owners. Councilman Rosselli questioned <br />City's recourse to recoup costs of demolition of the building, if so ordered. <br />City Attorney advised that if Council determined at conclusion of this public hear- <br />ing the structure on this property to be a hazard to public health and safety, a <br />resolution would be submitted for Council's adoption to that effect and the <br />property owner would be allowed thirty days to abate the nuisance, and failing to <br />do so, the City would be authorized to perform the abatement directly and costs <br />would be a lien on the tax roll. <br />Councilman Henderson questioned the abatement period procedure and was advised <br />by the City Attorney that abatement of property was necessitated by the fact <br />that evidence submitt6d indicated the building could not be made to comply to <br />standards required without complete reconstruction. <br />Councilman Henderson also questioned the two junked automobiles she had observed <br />on this property and asked whether they belonged to the owner of the property. <br />Chief Building Official acknowledged the fact that the automobiles had been there <br />for some time, but stated it had been impossible to determine ownership. Coun- <br />cilman Henderson also expressed concern for the fire hazard which might be presented <br />by weeds on this property and if immediate attention could be given to this problem. <br />Councilman Keckley questioned result of abatement proceedings, should property be <br />sold within the next thirty days, and was advised by City Attorney this abatement <br />proceeding, if approved, would attach to the property itself, regardless of a new <br />ownership in the meantime. City Attorney requested records indicate full documen- <br />tary report by Chief Building Official had been filed in the City Clerk's records. <br />(For full text see City Clerk's file - Abatements) <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman <br />Keckley and carried. <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 5373 DECLARING STRUCTURE LOCATED <br />AT 833 ARGUELLO STREET IN THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, DIRECT- <br />ING THE OWNER TO ABATE SAID NUISANCE, AND ORDERING THE EXPENSE OF ABATEMENT TO <br />BE MADE A LIEN UPON THE LAND IN THE EVENT THE NUISANCE IS NOT ABATED BY THE OWNER, <br />seconded by Councilman Petersen. <br />On the question, Councilman Granger questioned affect to City should County hold <br />a first lien on this property. City Attorney advised title report had been obtained <br />for this purpose to ascertain full record of title and that record had indicated <br />no liens on the property. City Manager advised he would check on the matter of <br />weeds on this property immediately. (Memo 6/6/67) Motion carried on roll call vote <br />Councilman Henderson referred to listing of other dilapidated buildings submitted by <br />Chief Building Official and asked that another listing be added for a structure <br />at Seventeenth Avenue off of Page Street which had been called to her attention as <br />a potential problem. City Manager stated he had noted this information. <br />(Memo 6/6/67) <br />PUBLIC HEARING on the Application of Ed Kenney for permit to move a one-story, wood <br />frame, single family dwelling from 1304 Morse Boulevard, San Carlos, to 68 Bonita <br />95 <br />JM 5 W <br />